Check for co-authorship and institutional conflicts between authors and suggested reviewers to support peer review integrity. Coauthorship and institutional conflict detection supported.

Organize, back up, compress, split, and merge files/folders using rule-driven plans; use when you need safe previews, conflict handling, and verification before executing file operations.

> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

Learning tutoring planning and content production skill for creating study plans, generating exercises, writing answer explanations, and providing review/adjustment guidance; triggered by requests like “study plan”, “exercise set/question bank”, “answer analysis”, “error analysis”, “exam prep plan”, or “spaced/periodic review schedule”.

Medical literature search strategy generator. Given a user's natural-language description (e.g., meta-analysis topic, PICOS elements, research question), automatically extract medical entities (disease, intervention, population, outcomes) and generate professional search queries for seven major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP). Useful for developing search strategies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Organize requirements into Markdown/JSON mind map structures; use when you need a hierarchical outline for mind map tools (e.g., XMind, ProcessOn, FreeMind) or for documentation planning.

Extract PDF selectable text and full-page or segmented page images (including tables) into Markdown with per-page headings and image links; use when you need both readable text and page visuals for PPT creation, review, or analysis.

Perform basic local PDF operations (merge, split, extract pages/text/tables, create) when users request offline PDF processing without external services.

Automatically generates a Markdown final-exam review plan or lab experiment schedule when you provide a date range, tasks/items, and available daily hours (via interactive prompts or a one-time JSON input).

Create and export PPTX decks using the local HTML/JS PPT framework in `D:\SKILL\project\ppt`. Use this when you need to generate slides from a topic/outline, edit slide content via `projects/*.js`, preview as HTML, or export a `.pptx` without relying on an existing template.

Check whether a paper’s Methods section contains all information needed for replication; use when preparing a manuscript for submission or reviewing methodological completeness.

Simulates a strict SCI peer-review workflow; trigger when a user uploads or pastes a manuscript (PDF/DOC/DOCX/TXT) and requests an innovation score (1–12) plus experimental-logic vulnerability checks and revision suggestions.

Generates a PROSPERO-compliant Meta-analysis protocol based on Title and PICOS. Use when the user wants to write a protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan's NSTC when you need agency-compliant narratives, budgets, and review-criteria alignment for a specific solicitation/FOA/BAA.

Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.

Programmatically edit Word documents (.docx) with live preview and track changes via SuperDoc VS Code extension. Use when editing DOCX files, making tracked changes, redlining, marking up contracts, or when the user wants to modify Word documents with insertions/deletions visible. Triggers on docx, Word, track changes, redline, markup.

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

Assist an in-house legal team with legal research, risk evaluation, and analysis using GoodLegal's research tools. Do not provide legal advice — flag that analyses must be reviewed by qualified legal

Use this skill whenever a lawyer or mediator needs help analyzing a dispute for mediation purposes. This includes: reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence) to identify issues in dispute, summarizing each party's position and interests, conducting legal analysis of the key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Trigger this skill when the user mentions 'mediation', 'dispute analysis', 'settlement', 'dispute resolution', 'identify issues in dispute', 'party positions', 'mediation brief', 'case analysis for mediation', 'ADR', 'mediation preparation', 'caucus strategy', 'settlement options', or any request to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with the goal of finding resolution. Also trigger when the user uploads case files and asks for a structured breakdown of who wants what, what the core disagreements are, or how the case might settle. Even if the user doesn't explicitly say 'mediation', trigger when the context involves analyzing opposing positions in a dispute with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal.

Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.

NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) contract analysis for NCAA student-athletes from the athlete's perspective. Use when user says 'review this NIL contract', 'analyze this NIL deal', 'check this athlete agreement', 'review my NIL agreement', or uploads a PDF NIL contract for review. Identifies red flags, missing protections, and compliance issues. Produces a structured review memorandum with negotiation positions. Do NOT use for general contract review, employment agreements, non-NIL endorsements, or brand-side deal analysis.

Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when User requests verification of legal documents, fact-checking of regulatory content, red team review, or quality assurance before distribution to clients/stakeholders. Provides structured verification reports with severity-categorized errors, verified sources, and distribution readiness assessment.

Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations. Triggers on: 'tabular review', 'document matrix', 'extract from documents', 'compare across documents', 'review multiple contracts'.

Commit changes, push to remote, and create a pull request. Use for completing features or fixes ready for review.

Full autonomous research workflow — brainstorm, plan, implement, review, and document

Run multi-agent econometric review on estimation code, identification arguments, and research artifacts

Download, split, and deeply read academic PDFs. Use when asked to read, review, or summarize an academic paper. Splits PDFs into 4-page chunks, reads them in small batches, and produces structured reading notes — avoiding context window crashes and shallow comprehension.

Structured literature search and synthesis with citation extraction and gap identification.

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, identification strategy, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections.

Conduct a systematic literature review using a parallel fleet of Librarian agents, each searching a different angle. Citation chains from anchor papers are the highest-yield search vector and always r

Produce a thorough, constructive review of an academic manuscript — the kind of report a top-journal referee would write.

Discovery phase combining research interviews, literature search, data discovery, and ideation. Routes to appropriate agents based on arguments. Replaces /interview-me, /lit-review, /find-data, /research-ideation.

All quality reviews — routes to appropriate critics based on target file type and flags. Replaces /paper-excellence, /proofread, /econometrics-check, /review-r, /review-paper.

Coordinate writing, revision, and submission workflows for collaborative academic and policy documents.

Create concise policy briefs that translate research into actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders.

Plan, draft and refine research papers with reproducible analysis and publication-ready manuscripts.

'APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.'

'Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.'

'Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.'

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

b2

g2

g5

universal-ma-codebook

Strategic publication planning and venue selection for research

Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.

A systematic review response workflow that helps researchers efficiently and professionally reply to reviewer comments.

Execute improvement plans generated by `skill-quality-reviewer` to automatically update and fix issues in Claude Skills.