Analyze recent conversation context and capture learnings—either to project knowledge files or to skills/commands/subagents for cross-project reuse.
Skills(SKILL.md)は、AIエージェント(Claude Code、Cursor、Codexなど)に特定の能力を追加するための設定ファイルです。
詳しく見る →Analyze recent conversation context and capture learnings—either to project knowledge files or to skills/commands/subagents for cross-project reuse.
Personal career coach with 4 modes: weekly reports, monthly reflections, self-reviews, promotion assessments
Use when writing or reviewing career documents including research statements, teaching statements, diversity statements, CVs, or biosketches. Invoke when user mentions research statement, teaching philosophy, diversity statement, biosketch, academic CV, faculty application, or needs help with career narrative, positioning, or professional documents for academic advancement.
Initialize career development system (job description, ladder, reviews, goals)
Use when writing user-facing copy, error messages, UI text, empty states, onboarding, or reviewing voice/tone
Catch up on codebase changes by reviewing the diff from master and reading relevant spec files.
Convert markdown newsletters to styled HTML matching the Catskill Crew brand and preview in browser
Evaluates Catz Android coding challenge submissions against SWORD Health requirements. Use when reviewing or assessing this coding challenge. Produces a structured markdown report with seniority level assessment (Junior/Mid/Senior/Staff) and confidence rating, covering requirements compliance, architecture, code quality, testing, and documentation.
Review code formatting and documentation using 74-item checklist from Code Complete. Two modes: CHECKER executes checklists with evidence tables, APPLIER guides layout decisions and commenting strategy. Use when code has inconsistent formatting, poor visual structure, unclear comments, or readability issues. Triggers on: review formatting, check layout, code style review, commenting style, make readable, multiple statements per line, endline layout, comments repeat code.
Verify construction prerequisites using 66-item checklists across requirements, architecture, and coding conventions. Output status tables (VIOLATION/WARNING/PASS) in CHECKER mode or prerequisite allocation recommendations in APPLIER mode. Use when unsure if project is ready to code, requirements feel incomplete, architecture unclear, no coding conventions defined, or noticing urge to skip planning. Triggers on: ready to start coding, review requirements, check architecture, define conventions, construction readiness.
Review control flow quality using 87-item checklist. Use when code has deep nesting (3+ levels), complex conditionals, loop design questions, high cyclomatic complexity (McCabe >10), or callback hell. Symptoms: arrow-shaped code, repeated conditions, confusing loop exits, lengthy if-else chains. Provide refactoring patterns (guard clauses, named booleans, table-driven methods) and modern guidance (async/await, pattern matching, functional pipelines). Produce verified code with pass/fail assessment.
Audit and fix data organization: variable declarations, data types, magic numbers, naming conventions, and global data. Three modes: CHECKER (92-item checklist -> status table), APPLIER (type selection and naming guidance), TRANSFORMER (fix violations). Cover modern types: concurrent/shared state, nullable/optional, temporal/timezone, security-sensitive. Use when reviewing code for data organization issues, choosing data types, or fixing magic numbers. Triggers on: review variables, data types, magic numbers, naming, global data, check types, fix floats, constants.
Review error handling, input validation, and exception patterns using 24-item checklist. Use when auditing defensive code, designing barricades, choosing assertion vs error handling, or deciding correctness vs robustness strategy. Triggers on: empty catch blocks, missing input validation, assertions with side effects, wrong exception abstraction level, garbage in garbage out mentality, deadline pressure to skip validation, trusted source rationalization. Produce status table with VIOLATION/WARNING/PASS per item, or barricade/error-handling design recommendations.
Enforce developer discipline under pressure by detecting rationalization patterns and providing counter-arguments. Use when stuck debugging, considering skipping reviews, feeling overconfident about technical decisions, resisting unfamiliar techniques, or treating methodology as dogma. Triggers on: just compile and see, ignoring warnings, 90% complete for weeks, gonzo programming, I don't need to test this, unrealistic estimates.
Review documentation quality across README, comments, API docs, changelog, and AI documentation (CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, copilot-instructions). Use when checking if documentation matches code, comments are stale, new features lack docs, or reviewing PR documentation. Triggers on: review docs, stale comments, update changelog, documentation debt, README accuracy, PR documentation review, missing docs.
Automatically discover collaboration and teamwork skills when working with collaboration. Activates for collaboration development tasks.
Automatically discover software engineering practice skills when working with engineering practices. Activates for engineering development tasks.
Gateway skill for research methodology - automatically loads relevant research skills based on task context
Execute quality checklists (112+ items) for code review, testing strategy, and debugging. CHECKER mode audits QA practices with evidence tables. APPLIER mode generates test cases (5:1 dirty ratio), runs Scientific Debugging Method (STABILIZE-HYPOTHESIZE-EXPERIMENT-FIX-VERIFY-SEARCH), or sets up inspection procedures. Use when planning QA, choosing review methods, designing tests, or debugging fails. Triggers on: defects found late, tests pass but production bugs, coverage disputes, review ineffective, spending excessive time debugging.
Guide safe refactoring with research-backed discipline and small-change rigor. Produce refactoring approach, step sequence, and risk assessment. Use when modifying existing code, improving structure without changing behavior, or deciding between refactor, rewrite, or fix-first. Triggers on: code smells, technical debt, just cleaning while I fix, small change treated casually, regression from trivial change, one-line change errors, production down with cleanup urge.
Evaluate routine and class design quality using Code Complete checklists (43 items). Use when designing routines or classes, reviewing class interfaces, choosing between inheritance and containment, or evaluating routine cohesion. Also trigger when tempted to use inheritance as a quick fix under deadline pressure, or when rationalizing 'but it works' for code with deep inheritance or many parameters. Produce severity-tagged reviews (VIOLATION/WARNING/PASS) in CHECKER mode or design decisions in APPLIER mode. Symptoms: vague routine names, >7 parameters, deep inheritance, mixed abstraction levels.
Interactive assistant for intercepting, debugging, analyzing and reviewing Claude Code API requests using mitmproxy. Guides setup, certificate configuration, and active traffic inspection via web or CLI interface. Supports learning Claude Code internals, debugging issues, and optimizing API usage.
Use when troubleshooting skill issues, understanding CC platform limitations, or reviewing skills for CC-specific gotchas. For skill creation tutorials, use plugin-dev:skill-development.
Use this skill for multi-step development tasks. Latent Chain Mode reduces token usage by 70-80% through hidden-state reasoning with 4-phase workflow: analysis → plan → impl → review.
Structured code review workflow integrated with CCPM's Linear-based project management system. Enforces "no completion claims without verification evidence" principle.
CLI tools execution specification (gemini/claude/codex/qwen/opencode) with unified prompt template, mode options, and auto-invoke triggers for code analysis and implementation tasks. Supports configurable CLI endpoints for analysis, write, and review modes.
Measures and limits cognitive load in Jakarta EE/MicroProfile code. Use when reviewing code complexity, designing services/entities, or identifying when to extract abstractions.
DECIDED前の設計レビュー(重要な決断に推奨)
IN_REVIEW実装をレビュー(APPROVED→DONE)
AWS CDKスタックのコードレビューとベストプラクティスを確認するためのスキルです。
Context Engineering 101 curriculum slide generation. Use this skill when working on CE101 curriculum to: (1) Generate styled PowerPoint presentations from markdown, (2) Create PNG previews of slides, (3) Update master presentation from curriculum modules
Creates comprehensive epic definitions with sequential reviews from 10 key personas. Use when you need to analyze requirements from multiple perspectives and generate structured epic documentation with cost estimates and risk assessments.
Generate and maintain the root CHANGELOG.md in a beginner-friendly, analogy-rich format from git state or a commit range.
Generate changelog entries. Use on releases or PR merges. Parses git commits, categorizes changes, formats changelog entries, and updates CHANGELOG.md.
Update CHANGELOG.md [Unreleased] section with business-focused entries via systematic file review
Guardrail framework for monitoring spend, efficiency, and CAC thresholds
Enforce consistent chapter formatting, numbering conventions, and structural alignment across the entire textbook. Use when creating new chapters, reviewing existing content for consistency, or establishing formatting standards.
Generate inline chat cards using DaisyUI components for user interactions. Use when creating interactive UI elements within a chat interface that require user input, confirmation, or selection. Supports affirmative/negative responses, multiple choice (radio), multiple select (checkbox), and content preview with feedback patterns.
check-btcpay
Check CI build status, PR checks, and pull request build results
This skill provides automated monitoring of GitHub Pull Request CI checks. It polls PR check status at regular intervals and reports when checks pass, fail, or timeout, enabling continuous integration
Run comprehensive Rust code quality checks including compilation, linting, documentation, and tests. Use after completing code changes and before creating commits.
Check for pending Codex (GitHub AI) feedback on current branch's PR. Use to review and address AI suggestions before merge. This is the rate-limiting step before merge.
Check if pull request already exists for current branch to support workflow resumption and prevent duplicate PR creation
Verify that hl_lines attributes in markdown code blocks correctly highlight the intended lines. Use when reviewing documentation with code examples, especially Before/After comparisons, or when highlights seem incorrect.
⚠️ MANDATORY - YOU MUST invoke this skill at the start of EVERY task. Reviews git history, status, and context before starting any work. Runs parallel git commands to understand current state, recent changes, and related work. NEVER gather git context manually.
Review inline code in markdown files for proper formatting and syntax highlighting. Check for missing backticks on CLI flags, filenames, and code elements. Verify that inline syntax highlighting (#!groovy) is used appropriately. Use when reviewing documentation or quiz questions.
check-lightning
Check Mojo code for memory safety issues (ownership violations, use-after-free, etc.). Use to catch memory bugs.
Voer een volledige kwaliteitscheck uit op de Hugo site. Gebruik wanneer de gebruiker wil controleren of de site correct bouwt of geen broken links heeft.