review

Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge readiness assessment.

code-review-auto

Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns. Use before merging PRs, after implementing features, or when reviewing code quality.

Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability

Auto-activates when user mentions code review, reviewing code, PR review, or checking code quality. Provides systematic code review process with TodoWrite checklist.

Frameworks for giving and receiving code review feedback effectively. Use for PR comments, review strategies, handling disagreements, and balancing thoroughness with kindness.

Building a positive code review culture that catches bugs, shares knowledge, maintains code quality, and builds team trust through effective review practices.

Expert-level code review focusing on quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use this skill for conducting thorough code reviews, identifying issues, and providing constructive feedback.

Provides systematic code review for microcontroller projects.

Automatically applies when reviewing code. Ensures structured review checklist covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation.

Code Review Gate Skill

Systematic code review workflows with bundled utilities for analyzing code quality, detecting patterns, and providing structured feedback. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests or conducting code audits.

JavaScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on functional patterns and modern APIs

In-depth code review for large PRs (>500 lines). Full analysis including architecture, performance, security, and maintainability.

Standard code review for medium PRs (100-500 lines). Includes code quality, security basics, and test coverage analysis.

Activate senior code reviewer mode. Delivers thorough, constructive, and actionable code review feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations.

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

Internal skill. Use cc10x-router for all development tasks.

Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, constructive, and thorough code reviews across teams.

Provides practical guidance for conducting thorough code reviews that identify issues early, promote knowledge sharing, and deliver constructive feedback. This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, establishing team review standards, or mentoring developers on effective review practices.

Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities. Use when user requests code review, security audit, or performance analysis.

Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.

Technical evaluation of code review feedback. Use when receiving review feedback - requires verification before implementing, no performative agreement, push back when technically wrong.

Review local codebase for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance using multi-agent analysis

Request and process code review efficiently with a simple rubric and patch plan

Rust-specific code review guidelines focusing on error handling, safety, and idiomatic patterns

Comprehensive code review and analysis. AUTO-TRIGGERS when user asks to review, refactor, debug, critique, or analyze code.

Quick code review for small PRs (<100 lines). Focuses on basic code quality, naming conventions, and obvious bugs.

Comprehensive code review standards covering security, quality, performance, testing, and documentation. Includes checklists, common issues, and best practices for thorough code reviews.

Natural language wrapper for code review - automatically triggers /code-review when users express intent to review code, check for bugs, or validate code quality

TypeScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on type safety and TypeScript idioms

PR review, code smell detection, best practice kontrolü. ⚠️ Kod incelerken kullan. Deliverable kontrolü için → quality-validator, doküman review için → peer-review.

Comprehensive code review skill for Wasp applications. Use when reviewing code, PRs, or architectural changes. Covers Wasp-specific patterns, import rules, auth checks, TDD compliance, multi-tenant permissions, and performance. Integrates all CLAUDE.md critical rules.

Complete code review workflow for PR/MR with multiple reviewers and automated checks. Triggers: PRW, 審查流程, review workflow, PR review, MR review, pull request, merge request, 程式碼審查流程, full review, 完整審查.

Provides thorough code review with actionable feedback

Use when reviewing code for quality, design issues, implementation problems, security vulnerabilities, or architectural concerns. Apply when user asks to review code, check implementation, find issues, or audit code quality. Use proactively after implementation is complete. Also use to provide feedback to system-architect and principal-engineer on design and implementation decisions.

Automated code review using official Claude Code plugin with 4 parallel agents.

Expert at quality-focused code review with security emphasis. Use when reviewing code changes, performing security audits, identifying bugs, ensuring code quality and maintainability, or analyzing pull requests for issues.

Comprehensive code review checking quality, security, and best practices. Triggers: CR, review, 審查, 檢查, check, 看一下, PR, code review, 品質, inspect, 檢視, 看看, 幫看, lint, quality check, 品質檢查, pull request, merge request, MR, diff, 程式碼審查.

Review code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use after code changes are completed and ready for review.

Provides quantitative rubrics and criteria for scoring code quality on a 1-10 scale. Use when reviewing code, performing code audits, establishing quality baselines, comparing implementations, or providing objective code feedback.

Performs comprehensive security code reviews to identify vulnerabilities, assess security risks, and provide actionable remediation guidance. Covers OWASP Top 10, CWE classifications, compliance requi

You are a code simplicity expert specializing in identifying over-engineering and enforcing YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It) principles. Your goal is to ensure code is as simple as possible while solv

Use this skill when you need to review and refactor code to make it simpler, more maintainable, and easier to understand. Helps with identifying overly complex solutions, unnecessary abstractions.

Review TypeScript + Vue code for maintainability issues. Use when checking code quality, architectural problems, type safety, or Vue best practices. Identifies technical debt in components, types, and reactive data handling.

**Persona:** Code quality auditor who catalogs issues without judgment, focusing on objective metrics.

code-smell-detector

Extract coding best practices from PR review comments and codebase analysis to generate `.claude/best-practices/` documentation.

Analyzes code for style and formatting issues including inconsistent formatting, naming conventions, code organization, comment quality, unused code, and magic numbers. Returns structured style issue reports with suggestions for improvement.