User feedback collection, NPS survey design, review analysis, sentiment analysis, feedback classification, and insight extraction reports. Use when establishing feedback loops.

Variable name improvement, function extraction, magic number constants, dead code removal, and code review. Use when code is hard to read, refactoring is needed, or PR review is required. Does not change behavior. Don't use for bug/security detection (Judge), new tests/coverage (Radar), architecture analysis (Atlas), or feature implementation (Builder).

A professional video analysis skill powered by a **dual-model architecture**: ByteDance **Seed-2.0-Mini** for rapid previews and Google **Gemini 2.5 Pro** for deep, cinematic-grade analysis. It provid

>-

An experimental prompt engineering project. Simulates a tech department management process with multiple specialists, cross review, and competitive improvement. Default 3 person team, 11 person involution mode optional. Emergency exit always available. A fun exploration of LLM capability boundaries.

Influencer marketing AI — brief, pitch, rate evaluation, performance review แบบ data-driven

Cloud Architect — AWS/GCP/Azure solution design, cost optimization, HA/DR, multi-region, IaC (Terraform/CDK), Well-Architected Review

สร้าง mobile app iOS/Android ด้วย React Native Flutter Swift Kotlin พร้อม deploy ขึ้น store

Review โค้ด debug refactor และอธิบายโค้ดแบบ senior developer รองรับทุกภาษา

Academic research assistant — literature review + methodology (quant/qual) + paper outline (IMRaD) + citation + research gap analysis

Study Technique Coach — Spaced Repetition, Active Recall, Feynman Technique, exam plan, schedule สำหรับนักเรียนและนักศึกษาไทย

>

Render Compose @Preview functions to PNG outside Android Studio. Use this to verify UI changes, iterate on designs, and compare before/after states across Android (Jetpack Compose) and Compose Multiplatform Desktop projects.

Use when the user asks to commit, create a git commit, checkpoint changes, save work to git, or write a commit message.

Use when the user asks to reflect on recent sessions, analyze repeated mistakes, or review prompting and agent patterns for improvement.

Use when the user wants an independent expert review of work done in this conversation before accepting or extending it.

Use when creating, editing, or visually reviewing Pencil (.pen) screens, components, or flows.

Use when reviewing a pull request, merge request, or local diff for correctness, security, and code quality.

Use when the user asks to create or update a pull request for the current branch.

Use when you want a deeper multi-angle quality review before shipping, especially after substantial or risky changes.

Use when reviewing a user-facing page or flow for usability issues, confusion, friction, or missed UX principles.

Use when removing a git worktree and cleaning up its associated local branch from the main repository.

forge-bugfix

forge-review

>-

>-

>-

Analyze and improve existing Ozor.ai video prompts for better output quality. Use this skill whenever the user has an Ozor prompt that produced mediocre results, wants to improve a video prompt, needs help debugging why a video didn't turn out well, or wants expert feedback on their prompt before running it. Trigger on phrases like 'improve this prompt', 'optimize my Ozor prompt', 'why did my video look bad', 'fix this prompt', 'make this prompt better', 'review my Ozor prompt', 'the video didn't turn out right', 'prompt feedback', 'better results from Ozor', or any request to refine, debug, or enhance an existing Ozor video prompt.

追踪文章审稿意见，将编辑反馈结构化记录并逐条落实。触发词：审稿意见/修改文章/这里写得不好/审稿反馈/帮我追踪这个意见。

生成认知结构当前状态快照，帮助用户了解知识体系全貌并决定今日优先处理项。触发词：「大脑地图」「认知状态」「今天做什么」「复盘」「系统状态」「看一下状态」「有什么积压」。

展示完整的科研数字分身供用户审核，收集反馈并标记审核状态。当用户想查看画像、或数据采集完成后进行确认时使用。

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

Continuous environmental scanning across six PESTEL categories — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal. Not a one-time analysis but an ongoing radar. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full scan and prioritises forces by impact, speed, and reversibility. Review mode checks the watch list monthly for movement and new signals. Alert mode defines concrete monitoring triggers for each top force. Use whenever someone wants to understand external forces acting on their business, assess macro risk, prepare for planning, or check whether the world has moved since last time they looked. Connects to the strategy map (forces act on the chain) and Wardley Map (forces drive component evolution). Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

First-principles strategy — strip away conventional assumptions and find the theoretical maximum for your business. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full session (45+ min) to define your theoretical maximum, map the gap honestly, classify constraints, invert for failure modes, set strategic intent, and work backwards to your first intervention. Review mode (15-20 min) checks whether your theoretical maximum has shifted, whether the gap has changed, and whether you're still climbing the right peak. Alert mode defines constraint-shift, peak-shift, and local-peak triggers that tell you when to reassess. Use when someone is stuck optimising incrementally, when conventional wisdom is driving strategy, when a new technology or regulation changes what's physically possible, or when you suspect the business is climbing a local peak. Integrates with company-context.md. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

Stress-test plans before committing by imagining they've already failed. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full pre-mortem session — vivid failure scene-setting, six failure categories, the monkey test, and concrete plan adjustments. Review mode checks previous findings monthly for changed probabilities and new failure modes. Alert Triggers mode defines and monitors early warning signals across four trigger categories. Use before any major commitment — strategy, investment, product launch, partnership — or regularly to keep assumptions honest. The planning fallacy is real. The spreadsheet looked great so everyone stopped thinking. This is the antidote. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

Use when the user asks to generate a blog cover image, thumbnail, or article header. Automatically uses modern typography, brand logos, and Google Search grounding to create beautiful 16:9 images with Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview.

>

>

Comprehensive code review guidelines for iOS/Swift covering architecture, performance, security, and best practices

Best practices for gathering requirements using AskUserQuestion before taking action

Horizontal-first slicing methodology with mandatory ASCII preview for UIKit layout design

'Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and maintainability in Apple-platform or Swift server projects.'

Audit Xcode project configuration, build settings, scheme behavior, and script phases to find build-time improvements with explicit approval gates. Use when a developer wants project-level build analysis, slow incremental builds, guidance on target dependencies, build settings review, run script phase analysis, parallelization improvements, or module-map and DEFINES_MODULE configuration.

Review changed code for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues. Use Codex sub-agents to review in parallel, but keep those sub-agents read-only: they should only inspect code and send findings

Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.

Implement App Intents for Siri, Shortcuts, Spotlight, widgets, Control Center, and Apple Intelligence on iOS. Covers AppIntent actions, AppEntity and EntityQuery models, AppShortcutsProvider phrases, IndexedEntity Spotlight indexing, WidgetConfigurationIntent, SnippetIntent, and assistant schemas. Use when exposing app actions or entities to system surfaces.

Prepare for App Store review and prevent rejections. Covers App Store review guidelines, app rejection reasons, PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy privacy manifest requirements, required API reason codes, in-app purchase IAP and StoreKit rules, App Store Guidelines compliance, ATT App Tracking Transparency, EU DMA Digital Markets Act, HIG compliance checklist, app submission preparation, review preparation, metadata requirements, entitlements, widgets, and Live Activities review rules. Use when preparing for App Store submission, fixing rejection reasons, auditing privacy manifests, implementing ATT consent flow, configuring StoreKit IAP, or checking HIG compliance.