Calculate code quality metrics - complexity, coverage, maintainability
Skills(SKILL.md)は、AIエージェント(Claude Code、Cursor、Codexなど)に特定の能力を追加するための設定ファイルです。
詳しく見る →Calculate code quality metrics - complexity, coverage, maintainability
Use when moving logic between layers, deprecating patterns, refactoring responsibilities, or enforcing canonical owners. Ensures migrations are complete with no legacy coexistence.
Migrate legacy code to modern frameworks, languages, and patterns with automated refactoring and testing
Otimizador automático de código usando análise evolutiva GEPA para melhorar qualidade, performance e manutenibilidade
> **Directory X contains ONLY class type X**
Use the VSCode CLI to open files at specific line and column positions when explaining code, debugging, pointing to TODOs, or guiding users to specific locations in files. Automatically invoked when Claude needs to show users exactly where in a file to look.
Build features when user wants to implement PRDs, write code for specs, or develop functionality. Works incrementally substory-by-substory with automatic testing and code review. Automatically loads PRD context to maintain consistency. Also writes standalone tests for any file.
Proactively audits developer work to ensure completeness and production-readiness. This skill should be used when reviewing code changes, validating task completion, or verifying that work meets industry standards—catching incomplete implementations, deferred features, hardcoded values, missing tests, and shortcuts before code goes to production.
Fix code quality issues identified in a code quality review stored in agent_artefacts/code_quality/<topic>/. Systematically addresses issues found by the code-quality-review-all skill for ANY code quality topic, with validation and testing at each step. Use when user asks to fix issues from a code quality review, or asks to fix issues from agent_artefacts/code_quality/<topic>.
コード品質基準の完全遵守を保証します。コミット前の品質チェックを自動実行し、エラーがある状態でのコミットを防止します。
Use automatically before and after code changes. Ensures documentation, formatting, type safety, and audit standards.
Expert code reviewer that enforces best practices, clean code principles, strong typing (TypeScript), architecture guidelines, and security standards. Reviews PRs and code snippets for bugs, code smells, anti-patterns, maintainability risks, performance issues, and security vulnerabilities. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, conducting code audits, or improving TypeScript/JavaScript codebases.
Proactive code health monitoring and quality gate enforcement. Use when validating code changes, reviewing PRs, or ensuring code meets quality standards before merging.
Systematic code quality improvement workflow combining smart-reviewer and test-generator MCP tools with Pareto 80/20 auto-fixes, severity-based review, and comprehensive test generation. Use when p...
Review all evaluations in the repository against a single code quality standard. Checks ALL evals against ONE standard for periodic quality reviews. Use when user asks to review/audit/check all evaluations for a specific topic or standard.
Conducts systematic code quality analysis across multiple dimensions: maintainability, readability, complexity, design patterns, naming conventions, code duplication, and adherence to best practices.
Comprehensive code quality review focusing on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself), KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid), and Clean Code (Easy to Read) principles. Use when reviewing code changes, analyzing code quality, or assessing code maintainability for any feature, bug fix, or refactoring task.
実装時に遵守すべきコード品質ルール(500行ルール、固定アーキテクチャ、SOLID原則、命名規則、テストカバレッジ要件)を定義
Code quality standards including SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, refactoring techniques, naming conventions, and technical debt management. Use when reviewing code, refactoring, ensuring quality, or detecting code smells.
执行代码质量门禁检查(测试通过→覆盖率→Lint→GOAL追溯→可提交),验证单元测试覆盖率≥80%、集成测试通过率≥95%、代码规范零错误。当完成代码实现、准备提交代码、需要质量验证、进行提交前自检时使用。确保代码可合并。
Implement code quality ratchets to prevent proliferation of deprecated patterns. Use when (1) migrating away from legacy code patterns, (2) enforcing gradual codebase improvements, (3) preventing copy-paste proliferation of deprecated practices, or (4) setting up pre-commit hooks to count and limit specific code patterns. A ratchet fails if pattern count exceeds OR falls below expected—ensuring patterns never increase and prompting updates when they decrease.
Writing clean, understandable, and self-documenting code that is easy to review and maintain over time.
Analyzes codebase for refactoring needs, generates todo reports, and validates completion
Refactor code for better organization, cleaner architecture, and improved maintainability. Use for reorganizing file structures, splitting large components, updating imports after moves, and enforcing consistent patterns across the codebase.
Guides systematic code refactoring to improve code quality, maintainability, and design. Identifies code smells, applies refactoring patterns, ensures test coverage, and follows safe refactoring practices. Produces cleaner, more maintainable code while preserving functionality. Use when improving code quality, eliminating technical debt, preparing for feature additions, addressing code smells, or when users mention refactoring, code cleanup, improving design, reducing complexity, or modernizing legacy code.
Systematic approach to refactoring code for improved maintainability, performance, and clarity while preserving functionality
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
Guide for refactoring duplicate code in the Orient. Use when extracting shared logic, consolidating services, or improving code organization. Covers tool-calling extraction, database unification, and monorepo migration patterns.
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing code improvement suggestions.
Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge readiness assessment.
Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns. Use before merging PRs, after implementing features, or when reviewing code quality.
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
Auto-activates when user mentions code review, reviewing code, PR review, or checking code quality. Provides systematic code review process with TodoWrite checklist.
Frameworks for giving and receiving code review feedback effectively. Use for PR comments, review strategies, handling disagreements, and balancing thoroughness with kindness.
Building a positive code review culture that catches bugs, shares knowledge, maintains code quality, and builds team trust through effective review practices.
Expert-level code review focusing on quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use this skill for conducting thorough code reviews, identifying issues, and providing constructive feedback.
Provides systematic code review for microcontroller projects.
Automatically applies when reviewing code. Ensures structured review checklist covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation.
Code Review Gate Skill
Systematic code review workflows with bundled utilities for analyzing code quality, detecting patterns, and providing structured feedback. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests or conducting code audits.
In-depth code review for large PRs (>500 lines). Full analysis including architecture, performance, security, and maintainability.
Activate senior code reviewer mode. Delivers thorough, constructive, and actionable code review feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, constructive, and thorough code reviews across teams.
Provides practical guidance for conducting thorough code reviews that identify issues early, promote knowledge sharing, and deliver constructive feedback. This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, establishing team review standards, or mentoring developers on effective review practices.
Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities. Use when user requests code review, security audit, or performance analysis.
Rust-specific code review guidelines focusing on error handling, safety, and idiomatic patterns
Comprehensive code review and analysis. AUTO-TRIGGERS when user asks to review, refactor, debug, critique, or analyze code.
Comprehensive code review standards covering security, quality, performance, testing, and documentation. Includes checklists, common issues, and best practices for thorough code reviews.
PR review, code smell detection, best practice kontrolü. ⚠️ Kod incelerken kullan. Deliverable kontrolü için → quality-validator, doküman review için → peer-review.
Comprehensive code review skill for Wasp applications. Use when reviewing code, PRs, or architectural changes. Covers Wasp-specific patterns, import rules, auth checks, TDD compliance, multi-tenant permissions, and performance. Integrates all CLAUDE.md critical rules.