Generate and render a pixel-precise ASCII TUI Transition component with complete output blocks (TUI_RENDER, COMPONENT_SPEC, PENCIL_SPEC, PENCIL_BATCH_DESIGN) for Pencil MCP drawing workflows. Use when the user asks to create a transition in a terminal UI, text-based interface, or Pencil MCP project.
Generate and render a pixel-precise ASCII TUI Uni Modules Setting component with complete output blocks (TUI_RENDER, COMPONENT_SPEC, PENCIL_SPEC, PENCIL_BATCH_DESIGN) for Pencil MCP drawing workflows. Use when the user asks to create an uni modules in a terminal UI, text-based interface, or Pencil MCP project.
Generate and render a pixel-precise ASCII TUI Upload component with complete output blocks (TUI_RENDER, COMPONENT_SPEC, PENCIL_SPEC, PENCIL_BATCH_DESIGN) for Pencil MCP drawing workflows. Use when the user asks to create an upload in a terminal UI, text-based interface, or Pencil MCP project.
Generate and render a pixel-precise ASCII TUI Verification Code component with complete output blocks (TUI_RENDER, COMPONENT_SPEC, PENCIL_SPEC, PENCIL_BATCH_DESIGN) for Pencil MCP drawing workflows. Use when the user asks to create a verification code in a terminal UI, text-based interface, or Pencil MCP project.
Generate and render a pixel-precise ASCII TUI Vuex Detail component with complete output blocks (TUI_RENDER, COMPONENT_SPEC, PENCIL_SPEC, PENCIL_BATCH_DESIGN) for Pencil MCP drawing workflows. Use when the user asks to create a vuex detail in a terminal UI, text-based interface, or Pencil MCP project.
Generate and render a pixel-precise ASCII TUI Waterfall component with complete output blocks (TUI_RENDER, COMPONENT_SPEC, PENCIL_SPEC, PENCIL_BATCH_DESIGN) for Pencil MCP drawing workflows. Use when the user asks to create a waterfall in a terminal UI, text-based interface, or Pencil MCP project.
Guide the daily Tauri v2 development workflow including dev server configuration, Rust+WebView debugging, sidecar management, and testing strategies. Use when setting up dev workflow, debugging both Rust and frontend, managing resources/sidecars, or choosing testing approaches.
Primary index and router for all Tauri v2 framework skills covering Rust backend, frontend integration, and the full plugin ecosystem. Use when any Tauri-related request is made to route to the correct specialized sub-skill with local examples and templates.
Provides comprehensive guidance for Appium mobile testing including mobile app automation, element location, gestures, and cross-platform testing. Use when the user asks about Appium, needs to test mobile applications, automate mobile apps, or write Appium test scripts.
Provides comprehensive guidance for Detox mobile testing framework including React Native testing, E2E testing, and test synchronization. Use when the user asks about Detox, needs to test React Native applications, write E2E tests for mobile apps, or configure Detox.
Provides comprehensive guidance for JUnit testing framework including test annotations, assertions, test lifecycle, and best practices. Use when the user asks about JUnit, needs to write Java unit tests, use JUnit annotations, or configure JUnit for Java projects.
Provides comprehensive guidance for Playwright testing including browser automation, test writing, page objects, and cross-browser testing. Use when the user asks about Playwright, needs to write E2E tests, automate browsers, or test web applications across browsers.
Provides comprehensive guidance for pytest testing framework including test writing, fixtures, parametrization, mocking, and plugins. Use when the user asks about pytest, needs to write Python tests, use pytest fixtures, or configure pytest for Python projects.
Provides comprehensive guidance for Selenium WebDriver including browser automation, element location, waits, and test frameworks. Use when the user asks about Selenium, needs to automate web browsers, write Selenium tests, or work with Selenium WebDriver.
Discovers, installs, and manages AI skills from the PartMe marketplace. Acts as the local package manager for Knowledge-as-a-Service (KaaS) and Tool-as-a-Service (TaaS) skills. Use when the user wants to search for available skills, install a new skill into their environment, or list currently installed skills.
Diagnose ClickHouse runtime query failures when the user wants database-level cause and fix guidance from an error or numeric error code, not source-code root cause analysis.
Investigate application or repository source code with search_file and read_file to explain behavior, trace root causes of runtime or query errors, and answer with precise file citations.
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, or extract information from web pages.
Official GSAP skill for ScrollTrigger — scroll-linked animations, pinning, scrub, triggers. Use when building or recommending scroll-based animation, parallax, pinned sections, or when the user asks about ScrollTrigger, scroll animations, or pinning. Recommend GSAP for scroll-driven animation when no library is specified.
Converts a biomedical study storyline into a graphical abstract and, when direct image capability is available, generates the graphical abstract directly; otherwise it falls back to prompts, Mermaid flowcharts, or designer-facing briefs.
Converts existing manuscript content into LaTeX format aligned with a target journal, conference, or template while preserving manuscript meaning and structural integrity.
Clarifies a vague clinical or biomedical research idea into a structured, bounded, searchable, researchable, and testable question. Always use this skill whenever a user has an early-stage clinical or research thought, an over-broad topic, an ill-defined evidence question, or an unclear problem statement that must be translated into a question framing suitable for literature retrieval, evidence synthesis, gap analysis, study design, or downstream protocol planning. Never jump straight to answering the substantive medical question unless the user explicitly asks for that. Focus first on question framing, boundary setting, and downstream-ready formulation.
Quickly judges whether a biomedical paper is worth deep reading by screening for question fit, design quality, sample adequacy, methodological novelty, and reproducibility value.
Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.
Generates complete bidirectional multi-phenotype Mendelian randomization research designs from a user-provided exposure family and outcome family. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a genome-wide causal-inference study based on publicly available GWAS summary statistics, especially when the article logic includes multiple exposures, multiple outcomes or subtypes, bidirectional MR, IV filtering, IVW as the main estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO sensitivity analyses, leave-one-out testing, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and multiple-testing control with FDR. Covers five study patterns (single-family bidirectional MR, multi-phenotype screening MR, subtype-resolved MR, phenome-style bidirectional causal map, mechanism-prioritized MR follow-up) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version...
Designs complete integrated research plans for bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related omics from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a bulk multi-omics or single-omics-plus-clinical study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, stratification-oriented, or translational projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend example datasets as reference candidates only, specify the core analysis modules and method choices, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, cohort availability, assay coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.
Design a structured case-control study framework with explicit source population logic, control selection rules, matching decisions, exposure measurement planning, and bias-control checkpoints.
Designs retrospective or prospective clinical cohort study protocols for biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a cohort-based study plan rather than a general study idea, evidence summary, or mechanistic experiment design. Focus on cohort appropriateness, enrollment logic, baseline time-zero definition, follow-up structure, endpoint definition, variable collection, confounding control, and a coherent primary statistical analysis line. Do not invent data availability, follow-up completeness, outcome ascertainment quality, sample size adequacy, or causal interpretability.
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
Design evidence-discovery and validation workflows for drug repurposing studies by integrating disease mechanisms, drug-target logic, expression reversal, real-world evidence, and validation routes into a closed-loop study blueprint.
Designs primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate study aims into operational endpoint definitions with event rules, assessment timing, composite logic, interpretability, and protocol-stage auditability. Focus on endpoint precision, feasibility, clinical meaning, ambiguity reduction, and implementation readiness rather than generic study design advice.
Generates complete FAERS-style pharmacovigilance disproportionality research designs from a user-provided drug class, comparator strategy, adverse-event domain, and patient-group stratification. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a spontaneous-report safety signal study using FAERS or a similar pharmacovigilance database, especially when the article logic includes product selection, indication-group stratification, MedDRA-based adverse-event extraction, serious-case filtering, suspect-drug and concomitant-exclusion logic, reporting odds ratio analysis, comparator-drug benchmarking, cross-drug comparison, and cautious signal interpretation without causal overclaiming. Covers five study patterns (single-drug disproportionality workflow, multi-drug class comparison workflow, indication-stratified workflow, comparator-controlled signal screening workflow...
Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.
Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.
Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.
Designs complete research plans that integrate clinical variables with multi-omics data from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a study that combines clinical variables with transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, or related omics layers for mechanism interpretation, biomarker development, risk stratification, treatment-response analysis, or translational use. It should define the clinical use case, alignment across data layers, feature-reduction and fusion logic, modeling route, mechanism-interpretation layer, validation ladder, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, platform coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.
Generates complete NHANES-style cross-sectional epidemiology + retrospective clinical validation research designs from a user-provided disease and biomarker direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a population-level biomarker association study using NHANES or similar survey datasets, especially when the article logic includes disease definition, biomarker formula derivation, multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis, subgroup stability testing, and a secondary hospital-based retrospective validation cohort. Covers five study patterns (cross-sectional association, dose-response / RCS, subgroup-stability, NHANES + retrospective validation, preliminary screening-performance) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.
Designs discovery, modeling, and validation workflows for prognostic biomarkers in biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a prognostic biomarker study blueprint rather than a diagnostic test protocol, predictive biomarker design, treatment recommendation, or a completed manuscript. Focus on endpoint family, follow-up horizon, time scale, candidate marker strategy, model-building logic, risk stratification framework, and internal/external validation requirements. Do not invent cohort size, event rate, assay readiness, literature support, or validation access.