Systematic code quality improvement workflow combining smart-reviewer and test-generator MCP tools with Pareto 80/20 auto-fixes, severity-based review, and comprehensive test generation. Use when p...

Review all evaluations in the repository against a single code quality standard. Checks ALL evals against ONE standard for periodic quality reviews. Use when user asks to review/audit/check all evaluations for a specific topic or standard.

Conducts systematic code quality analysis across multiple dimensions: maintainability, readability, complexity, design patterns, naming conventions, code duplication, and adherence to best practices.

Comprehensive code quality review focusing on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself), KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid), and Clean Code (Easy to Read) principles. Use when reviewing code changes, analyzing code quality, or assessing code maintainability for any feature, bug fix, or refactoring task.

Code quality standards including SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, refactoring techniques, naming conventions, and technical debt management. Use when reviewing code, refactoring, ensuring quality, or detecting code smells.

Use when assessing or improving code quality, maintainability, performance, or security hygiene - provides workflows for analysis, code review, and systematic improvements with validation steps.

Implement code quality ratchets to prevent proliferation of deprecated patterns. Use when (1) migrating away from legacy code patterns, (2) enforcing gradual codebase improvements, (3) preventing copy-paste proliferation of deprecated practices, or (4) setting up pre-commit hooks to count and limit specific code patterns. A ratchet fails if pattern count exceeds OR falls below expected—ensuring patterns never increase and prompting updates when they decrease.

Writing clean, understandable, and self-documenting code that is easy to review and maintain over time.

Analyzes codebases by impact scope (low/medium/high), generates refactoring checklists, supports interactive review, executes refactors with QA, and produces detailed optimization reports.

Guides systematic code refactoring to improve code quality, maintainability, and design. Identifies code smells, applies refactoring patterns, ensures test coverage, and follows safe refactoring practices. Produces cleaner, more maintainable code while preserving functionality. Use when improving code quality, eliminating technical debt, preparing for feature additions, addressing code smells, or when users mention refactoring, code cleanup, improving design, reducing complexity, or modernizing legacy code.

Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing code improvement suggestions.

Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge readiness assessment.

code-review-auto

Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns. Use before merging PRs, after implementing features, or when reviewing code quality.

Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability

Auto-activates when user mentions code review, reviewing code, PR review, or checking code quality. Provides systematic code review process with TodoWrite checklist.

Frameworks for giving and receiving code review feedback effectively. Use for PR comments, review strategies, handling disagreements, and balancing thoroughness with kindness.

Building a positive code review culture that catches bugs, shares knowledge, maintains code quality, and builds team trust through effective review practices.

Expert-level code review focusing on quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use this skill for conducting thorough code reviews, identifying issues, and providing constructive feedback.

Provides systematic code review for microcontroller projects.

Automatically applies when reviewing code. Ensures structured review checklist covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation.

Code Review Gate Skill

Systematic code review workflows with bundled utilities for analyzing code quality, detecting patterns, and providing structured feedback. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests or conducting code audits.

JavaScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on functional patterns and modern APIs

In-depth code review for large PRs (>500 lines). Full analysis including architecture, performance, security, and maintainability.

Standard code review for medium PRs (100-500 lines). Includes code quality, security basics, and test coverage analysis.

Activate senior code reviewer mode. Delivers thorough, constructive, and actionable code review feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations.

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

Internal skill. Use cc10x-router for all development tasks.

Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, constructive, and thorough code reviews across teams.

Provides practical guidance for conducting thorough code reviews that identify issues early, promote knowledge sharing, and deliver constructive feedback. This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, establishing team review standards, or mentoring developers on effective review practices.

Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities. Use when user requests code review, security audit, or performance analysis.

Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.

Technical evaluation of code review feedback. Use when receiving review feedback - requires verification before implementing, no performative agreement, push back when technically wrong.

Review local codebase for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance using multi-agent analysis

Request and process code review efficiently with a simple rubric and patch plan

Rust-specific code review guidelines focusing on error handling, safety, and idiomatic patterns

Comprehensive code review and analysis. AUTO-TRIGGERS when user asks to review, refactor, debug, critique, or analyze code.

Quick code review for small PRs (<100 lines). Focuses on basic code quality, naming conventions, and obvious bugs.

Comprehensive code review standards covering security, quality, performance, testing, and documentation. Includes checklists, common issues, and best practices for thorough code reviews.

Natural language wrapper for code review - automatically triggers /code-review when users express intent to review code, check for bugs, or validate code quality

TypeScript-specific code review guidelines focusing on type safety and TypeScript idioms

PR review, code smell detection, best practice kontrolü. ⚠️ Kod incelerken kullan. Deliverable kontrolü için → quality-validator, doküman review için → peer-review.

Comprehensive code review skill for Wasp applications. Use when reviewing code, PRs, or architectural changes. Covers Wasp-specific patterns, import rules, auth checks, TDD compliance, multi-tenant permissions, and performance. Integrates all CLAUDE.md critical rules.

Provides thorough code review with actionable feedback

Use when reviewing code for quality, design issues, implementation problems, security vulnerabilities, or architectural concerns. Apply when user asks to review code, check implementation, find issues, or audit code quality. Use proactively after implementation is complete. Also use to provide feedback to system-architect and principal-engineer on design and implementation decisions.

Automated code review using official Claude Code plugin with 4 parallel agents.

Expert at quality-focused code review with security emphasis. Use when reviewing code changes, performing security audits, identifying bugs, ensuring code quality and maintainability, or analyzing pull requests for issues.

Review code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use after code changes are completed and ready for review.

Provides quantitative rubrics and criteria for scoring code quality on a 1-10 scale. Use when reviewing code, performing code audits, establishing quality baselines, comparing implementations, or providing objective code feedback.