Drafts professional, empathetic responses to e-commerce reviews and feedback emails, utilizing positive scripting and strictly adhering to user-provided instructions.

Manages the specific workflow for reviewing vendor quotes against requirements, negotiating costs, validating with the service providers team, and coordinating site visits involving the events team.

Analyzes Amazon product reviews to identify and list distinct categories of negative feedback with relevant quotes for product improvement research.

Generates authentic product reviews with subject lines and random person names, adapting to user-defined constraints for tone, length, and specific features.

Review and summarize user-submitted stories or text without providing revisions, edits, or rewrites. The review itself should be simple and avoid overly complex vocabulary.

Generates structured, SEO-friendly product and app reviews section-by-section, incorporating specific dimensions, battery capacity, and runtime details for camping gear. Includes concise pros/cons and a persuasive 'best in category' summary with strict word count adherence.

Writes technical report sections and literature reviews on sustainable building design and computer modeling, adhering to specific citation counts and APA formatting.

Analyzes presentation slides sequentially for correctness and trends, ensures content is accessible to non-experts (low jargon), and generates a speaking script upon completion.

Evaluates and recommends Advanced Placement (AP) exam preparation books by strictly prioritizing author credentials (AP readers, consultants, teachers) and content crammability, while explicitly ignoring user reviews and practice test volume.

Autonomous agent that retrieves Simple English Wikipedia articles, identifies grammatical, factual, and clarity errors, and reports findings via messages or log files. It operates autonomously with strict JSON output, memory management, and state preservation.

Acts as a Data Scientist to generate R code for ranking plant configurations using Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Neural Networks, and AHP. Also acts as a Thesis Examiner to critique methodology, ask specific questions about hyperparameters and architecture, and suggest improvements.

Generates, rewrites, or refines text (captions, scripts, reviews, FAQs, bios, spiritual content, educational marketing) strictly adhering to word counts, character limits, and styles. Specializes in simple, friendly copy, branded spiritual content for 'Epiphaize', enthusiastic CEO captions, and professional marketing copy for 'NUXLES' (GED/HiSET).

Generates a comprehensive slide-by-slide outline for a Customer Journey Mapping presentation based on a specific structure covering definitions, personas, touchpoints, stages, goals, current state, pain points, prioritization, implementation, testing, and review.

Generates a comprehensive study guide, expected problem formats, general solution strategies, and similar practice problems with solutions based on provided course review materials.

Writes first-person paragraphs for a dissertation methodology section explaining why studies were excluded from a systematic review based on specific criteria like duplicates, geography, language, accessibility, or date.

Generates public responses to customer reviews as Erik, using cool, young slang that avoids being cringe. Includes a hard constraint against the word 'thrilled' and supports Hungarian responses.

Generates a comprehensive organizational analysis report following a specific 9-step framework, including literature review, detailed company profile, life cycle analysis, structural dimensions, Porter's Five Forces, key findings, and recommendations.

Generates structured, first-person performance goals (financial, client, franchise, etc.) using bullet points, specific phrasing patterns, and includes a review section for rating.

Assist with a dissertation examining psychological factors, screening, barriers, and treatment effectiveness for US law enforcement officers, using qualitative methodology and first-person academic writing.

Writes the introduction section of a systematic review following a specific 8-point structure, ensuring accessibility for readers unfamiliar with the field.

Reviews and corrects slide content for WCAG 2.1 success criteria handbooks, ensuring accuracy of requirements, user impact, and verification checks. It provides a detailed correctness analysis followed by corrected bullet-point content.

Generates high-standard academic sections (dissertations, reports, essays) and provides diagnostic reviews. Adheres to strict word counts, SCI tone, marking criteria, and referencing constraints. Capable of drafting, continuing text, and offering feedback without direct edits unless requested.

Selects AP exam preparation books by evaluating author credentials (specifically AP teaching, reading, or consulting experience) and the book's suitability for efficient cramming, while disregarding user reviews and practice test quantity.

An autonomous agent that retrieves Simple English Wikipedia articles and analyzes them strictly for grammatical, spelling, and formatting errors. It reports findings via JSON, manages memory, and ignores content completeness or factual accuracy.

Write a college-level film review essay evaluating a film's value as an educational resource, strictly adhering to a provided grading rubric and specific length constraints.

Summarizes or rewrites provided venue information into a review or description of approximately 100 words in English, optionally using simple language.

Generates comprehensive content or an outline for a presentation on Customer Journey Mapping, strictly covering specific key areas including definitions, personas, touchpoints, stages, goals, current state mapping, pain points, prioritization, implementation, testing, and review.

Generates professional Q&A cold calling scripts for selling Google Maps review services, focusing on business potential and competitor analysis.

Implement a full-stack React and Flask solution for creating and updating 'annonce' entries with media. Features include client-side previews, upload progress tracking, and server-side file management (saving new files and deleting old ones during updates).

Reviews specific chapters of a product accountability report against a provided SDLC structure, evaluating adherence, logical flow, and technical quality.

A tech team lead persona that scrutinizes code with a sarcastic, derogatory tone, using lowercase and roasting the user in comments while providing correct technical solutions.

Reviews and refines accessibility documentation or slides structured by Requirement, Purpose, Check, and Note, ensuring correctness, completeness, and clarity against WCAG 2.1 success criteria for delivery teams.

Generate marketing copy, course descriptions, reviews, and HTML content updates for a GED/HiSET preparation website. Ensure content is concise, professional, and adheres to specific character counts or formatting constraints provided by the user.

Generates public responses to customer reviews and shop owner bios for a 3D printed board game accessory business, using a cool, young slang style without being cringe or using the word 'thrilled'.

Technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging techniques, and quality check workflow. Use when making technical decisions, detecting code smells, or performing quality assurance.

Documentation creation criteria including PRD, ADR, Design Doc, and Work Plan requirements with templates. Use when creating or reviewing technical documents, or determining which documents are required.

Frontend-specific technical decision criteria, anti-patterns, debugging techniques, and quality check workflow. Use when making frontend technical decisions or performing quality assurance.

Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.

Design Doc compliance and security validation with optional auto-fixes

Generate PRD and Design Docs from existing codebase through discovery, generation, verification, and review workflow

Design Doc compliance and security validation with optional auto-fixes

Update existing design documents (Design Doc / PRD / ADR) with review

Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.

Use **`/opsx:continue`** to create the next artifact in the dependency chain. This builds a change incrementally — one artifact at a time — giving the user control to review and edit before proceeding

Add a Webview panel to a VS Code extension for displaying custom HTML content (forms, charts, complex layouts) using vscode.window.createWebviewPanel. Use when the user needs custom UI that cannot be achieved with standard VS Code UI elements, such as dashboards, settings forms, or rich previews.

Coordinate software release preparation, rollout readiness, migration notes, rollback planning, stakeholder communication, and final go/no-go release packets. Use when asked to prepare a release packet, review release readiness, or turn scattered launch notes into one reusable release workflow. Do not use for generic project planning, one-off announcement drafting, or high-level release theory.

Review frontend code before merge.

Review frontend code for accessibility, risky UI security issues, missing loading and error states, and pre-merge regressions. Use when asked to review React, UI, forms, frontend components, or merge-readiness for the frontend.

Build governed incident command packets. Use when asked to standardize incident review, run severity assessment, or assemble incident communication.

Review frontend code for accessibility, UI security, missing states, and UX regressions. Use when asked to review React components, run a pre-merge frontend review, or check a11y and unsafe rendering.