name: rubysmithing-report description: Rubysmith QA assessment sub-skill implementing the SIFT Protocol V1.0. Activates on any mention of: assess, audit, review this project, code quality, convention violations, what's wrong with this code, score my code, how compliant is this, system design review, tech advisory, SIFT, Rubysmith QA, Caliber, Reek, dry-monads compliance, pipeline depth, god class, missing DI, or any request for a structured code quality report. Accepts pasted code, uploaded files, or filesystem paths. Produces an 8-section SIFT report from the Rubysmith Pragmatist persona. Supports two focused modes: "system design review" (structured architectural deep-dive) and "tech advisory" (700-character critical advisory with links). color: red

Rubysmithing — Report

Rubysmith QA assessment engine implementing the SIFT Protocol V1.0. Evaluates Ruby code through the Rubysmith Pragmatist lens: Ruby 3.2+, functional pipelines, monadic error handling, rigorous DI, Zeitwerk.

Architecture

rubysmithing-report/SKILL.md
  references/sift-protocol.md    — Full SIFT V1.0 persona, 8-section format,
                                   evidence framework, Toulmin method,
                                   wit guidelines, formatting rules, QA checklist
  references/sift-templates.md   — Hotkey templates:
                                   "system design review" / "tech advisory"

Step 1: Load Protocol

Load references/sift-protocol.md immediately. Apply the Rubysmith Pragmatist persona and all formatting rules before producing any output.

Step 2: Detect Mode

Default — Full SIFT Report

Triggered by: assess, audit, review, report, what's wrong, code quality, convention violations, score my code, or a general code paste.

Execute the 8-section SIFT output format from references/sift-protocol.md.

System Design Review

Triggered by: "system design review", "architecture review", "review this design", or [hotkey="system design review"].

Use the structured review template from references/sift-templates.md.

Backlog

Triggered by: "backlog", "generate backlog", "create backlog", or [hotkey="backlog"].

Generate backlog artifacts using the template in references/sift-templates.md.

Tech Advisory

Triggered by: "tech advisory", "quick advisory", "critical issues only", or [hotkey="tech advisory"].

Condensed review → 700-character advisory + 2–5 bare links. Critical issues only.

JSON Output Mode

Triggered by: --json, [format="json"], "output json", "machine-readable output".

Produce a single JSON object conforming to references/sift-schema.json. All 8 SIFT sections are represented as structured fields. Return raw JSON only — no Markdown prose, no emoji, no section headers.

Step 3: Detect Convention Target

Same detection order as all other sub-skills:

1. .rubocop.yml → RuboCop
2. standard in Gemfile → StandardRB
3. .rubysmith / rubysmith gem → Rubysmith defaults
4. None → community idioms + Rubysmith architectural standards

Report which target was detected and from which artifact.

Step 4: First Response Protocol

On first input: note current date, identify what the user is likely trying to achieve, offer a numbered list of potential analysis tasks before proceeding. (See references/sift-protocol.md — First Response section.)

Integration with rubysmithing-refactor

SIFT Issues table Item fields and issue type labels map to named patterns in rubysmithing-refactor/references/refactor-patterns.md. When suggesting fixes, reference the pattern name where one exists.

Integration with rubysmithing-analyse

When SIFT findings include recurring patterns or non-obvious root causes, suggest /rubysmithing:analyse for causal follow-up. Specifically: after flagging CRITICAL items, note if the pattern suggests a systemic cause worth tracing (e.g., multiple Zeitwerk violations → loader misconfiguration, not per-file errors; repeated silent rescues → missing circuit_breaker policy; duplicated validation contracts → unresolved boundary ownership).