name: ontology-mapper
description: >
Map materials science terms, crystal structures, and sample descriptions to
standardized ontology classes and properties — resolve natural-language
concepts to ontology entries with confidence scores, translate Bravais
lattice types, space groups, and lattice constants into ontology-compliant
annotations, and produce full sample metadata from structured descriptions.
Supports any ontology in ontology_registry.json (CMSO, ASMO, etc.). Use
when annotating simulation inputs with FAIR metadata, translating "BCC
iron" or "FCC copper" into formal ontology terms, preparing machine-
readable sample descriptions, or bridging between lab vocabulary and
ontology vocabulary, even if the user only says "what CMSO terms describe
my material" or "annotate this sample for me."
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob
metadata:
author: HeshamFS
version: "1.1.0"
security_tier: low
security_reviewed: true
tested_with:
- claude-code
- gemini-cli
- vs-code-copilot
eval_cases: 2
last_reviewed: "2026-03-26"
Ontology Mapper
Goal
Translate real-world materials science descriptions into standardized ontology annotations. Given terms like "FCC copper" or structured data like {"material": "iron", "structure": "BCC", "lattice_a": 2.87}, produce the corresponding ontology classes and properties for any registered ontology.
Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- No external dependencies (Python standard library only)
- Requires ontology-explorer's summary JSON and
ontology_registry.json
- Per-ontology mapping config (
<name>_mappings.json) for ontology-specific synonyms and labels
Inputs to Gather
| Input | Description | Example |
|---|
| Ontology | Ontology name from registry | cmso, asmo |
| Term(s) | Natural-language materials concept(s) | "unit cell", "FCC,copper,lattice" |
| Crystal system | One of the 7 crystal systems | cubic, hexagonal |
| Bravais lattice | Lattice type (symbol or common name) | FCC, cF, BCC |
| Space group | Space group number (1-230) | 225 |
| Lattice parameters | a, b, c in angstroms; alpha, beta, gamma in degrees | a=3.615 |
| Sample description | JSON dict with material properties | {"material":"copper","structure":"FCC"} |
Decision Guidance
What do you need to map?
├── A concept or term to find its ontology class
│ └── concept_mapper.py --ontology <name> --term "<term>"
├── Crystal structure parameters to ontology terms
│ └── crystal_mapper.py --ontology <name> --bravais <type> --space-group <N> --a <val>
├── A full sample description to ontology annotations
│ └── sample_annotator.py --ontology <name> --sample '<json>'
└── Multiple terms at once
└── concept_mapper.py --ontology <name> --terms "term1,term2,term3"
Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Key Outputs |
|---|
scripts/concept_mapper.py | results.matches, results.unmatched, results.suggestions |
scripts/crystal_mapper.py | results.ontology_classes, results.ontology_properties, results.effective_system, results.bravais_lattice, results.validation_warnings |
scripts/sample_annotator.py | results.annotations, results.sample_type, results.material_type, results.unmapped_fields, results.suggested_properties |
Workflow
- If the user provides natural-language terms, use
concept_mapper.py to find matching ontology classes.
- If the user describes crystal structure parameters, use
crystal_mapper.py to map them and validate constraints.
- For a complete sample description, use
sample_annotator.py to produce full ontology annotations.
- Review any validation warnings (e.g., lattice parameter mismatches for the crystal system).
- Check
unmapped_fields and suggested_properties for completeness.
Conversational Workflow Example
User: I'm setting up an MD simulation of BCC iron with lattice parameter 2.87 angstroms.
What CMSO terms should I use?
Agent: Let me map your iron sample to CMSO ontology terms.
[Runs: sample_annotator.py --ontology cmso --sample '{"material":"iron","structure":"BCC","lattice_a":2.87,"space_group":229}' --json]
Your BCC iron simulation maps to these CMSO annotations:
- **Sample**: Atomic Scale Sample (subclass of Computational Sample)
- **Material**: Crystalline Material
- **Unit Cell**: Bravais lattice = "cI" (body-centered cubic)
- **Space Group**: number = 229 (Im-3m)
- **Lattice**: a = 2.87 Å
- **Element**: Fe
Suggested additions:
- Number of atoms in the simulation cell
- Simulation cell vectors and angles
CLI Examples
# Map a single concept
python3 skills/ontology/ontology-mapper/scripts/concept_mapper.py \
--ontology cmso --term "space group" --json
# Map multiple terms
python3 skills/ontology/ontology-mapper/scripts/concept_mapper.py \
--ontology cmso --terms "FCC,copper,lattice constant" --json
# Map crystal parameters (with ontology-specific labels)
python3 skills/ontology/ontology-mapper/scripts/crystal_mapper.py \
--ontology cmso --bravais FCC --space-group 225 --a 3.615 --json
# Map crystal parameters (generic labels, no ontology specified)
python3 skills/ontology/ontology-mapper/scripts/crystal_mapper.py \
--bravais FCC --space-group 225 --a 3.615 --json
# Annotate a full sample
python3 skills/ontology/ontology-mapper/scripts/sample_annotator.py \
--ontology cmso \
--sample '{"material":"copper","structure":"FCC","space_group":225,"lattice_a":3.615}' \
--json
Adding a New Ontology
To support a new ontology (e.g., ASMO), create a <name>_mappings.json in references/:
{
"ontology": "asmo",
"synonyms": { "simulation method": "Simulation Method", ... },
"property_synonyms": { "timestep": "has timestep", ... },
"material_type_rules": { "keyword_rules": [...], "default": "Material" },
"sample_schema": { "sample_class": "Simulation", ... },
"crystal_output": { "base_classes": [...], "property_map": {...} },
"annotation_routing": { "unit_cell_indicators": [...], ... }
}
Then add "mappings_file": "asmo_mappings.json" to the ontology's entry in ontology_registry.json. No code changes needed.
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|---|
space_group must be between 1 and 230 | Invalid space group number | Use a valid space group number |
a must be positive | Non-positive lattice parameter | Provide positive values in angstroms |
Sample must be a non-empty dict | Empty or missing sample data | Provide a valid JSON sample dict |
| Validation warnings | Lattice parameters inconsistent with crystal system | Check that a=b=c for cubic, etc. |
Interpretation Guidance
- Confidence scores: 1.0 = exact match, 0.9 = synonym match, 0.7 = substring match, 0.5 = description match
- Validation warnings: indicate potential mistakes (e.g., specifying a!=b for cubic). These are warnings, not errors — the mapping still proceeds.
- Unmapped fields: input keys that the annotator doesn't recognize. These may need manual mapping.
- Suggested properties: additional ontology properties that would make the annotation more complete.
Security
Input Validation
--ontology is validated against registered ontology names in ontology_registry.json (fixed allowlist)
--term and --terms are length-limited and used only for substring matching against pre-processed synonym tables (never interpolated into code)
--bravais is validated against a fixed set of recognized lattice type symbols
--space-group is validated as an integer between 1 and 230
- Lattice parameters (
--a, --b, --c, --alpha, --beta, --gamma) are validated as finite positive numbers
--sample JSON is parsed with json.loads() and validated as a non-empty dict; keys and values are type-checked
File Access
- Scripts read pre-processed JSON files from the
references/ directory: ontology_registry.json, *_mappings.json, *_summary.json, crystal_systems.json, element_data.json (all read-only)
- No scripts write to the filesystem; all output goes to stdout
- No network access is required
Tool Restrictions
- Read: Used to inspect script source, reference files, and ontology data
- Grep: Used to search reference files for mapping patterns or ontology terms
- Glob: Used to locate reference files and ontology data
- Notably, this skill has no Bash or Write access, giving it the lowest attack surface of all skills
Safety Measures
- No
eval(), exec(), or dynamic code generation
- No subprocess calls of any kind; all logic runs within Python scripts invoked by the agent
- No file writes; the skill is purely read-only and analytical
- Minimal tool surface (Read, Grep, Glob only) means the agent cannot execute arbitrary commands or modify the filesystem
Limitations
- Concept mapping uses string matching and a per-ontology synonym table; it does not understand arbitrary natural language
- Crystal system validation checks basic constraints only (not all crystallographic rules)
- The element resolver recognizes common element names and symbols but may miss unusual spellings
- Bravais lattice aliases cover common usage (FCC, BCC, HCP) but not all crystallographic notation variants
References
- Mapping Patterns — common mapping examples
- Crystal Systems — crystal system definitions and Bravais lattices
- Element Data — periodic table data
- CMSO Mappings — CMSO-specific synonym tables and annotation config
- CMSO Guide — CMSO ontology overview
Version History
| Date | Version | Changes |
|---|
| 2026-02-25 | 1.1 | Refactored for multi-ontology support: externalized CMSO-specific knowledge to config |
| 2026-02-25 | 1.0 | Initial release with CMSO mapping support |