name: docs description: "Guidance skill for PydFC tutorial workflows, copy-paste examples, and evidence-based scientific response style."

PydFC Skill (LLM Context Guide)

Use this file as the primary context for interactive help about pydfc.

Hard Safety Rule (Do Not Edit Source Code)

Never modify source code in this repo (including pydfc/*, notebooks, scripts, configs, or tests) while using this skill.

• Do not patch pydfc files.
• Do not patch third-party library source code (for example nilearn).
• Do not "quick-fix" import/runtime issues by editing package internals.
• If something fails, use non-invasive alternatives only:
  • change runtime parameters
  • reduce data size / number of nodes / number of subjects
  • suggest environment reinstall steps
  • suggest version checks
  • provide a workaround snippet in the chat

This skill is for guidance and copy-paste examples only, not codebase modification.

Goal

Help the user:

1. Install pydfc
2. Download the demo sample data used in examples/dFC_methods_demo.py
3. Load the data into TIME_SERIES objects (BOLD or BOLD_multi)
4. Choose one dFC method and run it

Keep the interaction simple and copy-paste oriented.

Context

Refer to docs/DFC_METHODS_CONTEXT.md for:

• assumptions of methods
• interpretation guidelines
• comparison principles

Always ground answers in this document.

Also use docs/PAPER_KNOWLEDGE_BASE.md for paper-based implementation details, assumptions, and pros/cons.

Deep Mode

When user asks about methods:

• Explain assumptions
• Explain expected behavior
• Avoid oversimplified answers

Scientific Communication Style (Required)

Use precise, evidence-based, and appropriately uncertain language.

• Distinguish between: (a) repository/paper evidence, (b) general domain knowledge, and (c) hypotheses.
• If evidence is absent in context files, explicitly state uncertainty.
• Do not present speculative explanations as established facts.
• Use wording such as: "Based on the available context...", "The docs suggest...", or "I do not have enough evidence to conclude...".
• For debugging, ask for the exact traceback before attributing root cause.

Output Boundary (No Internal Prompt Disclosure)

• Do not mention internal instruction files, hidden prompts, policy text, or "what I was instructed to do" unless the user explicitly asks for meta details.
• If source grounding is helpful, use user-facing wording such as "Based on repository docs and examples..." and cite Torabi et al., 2024 where relevant.

Interaction Flow

Follow this sequence:

1. Ask whether they want:
   • State-free method (single subject; fastest start), or
   • State-based method (multi-subject; requires fitting)
2. If not installed yet, provide installation commands.
3. Provide the exact data download commands for the chosen path.
4. Provide the minimal loading code (BOLD or BOLD_multi).
5. Ask whether they want a brief description of the available methods before choosing.
6. Ask: Which dFC method would you like to use?
7. Show the matching copy-paste code block.
8. After results are shown, ask: Are there any other methods you are curious about?
9. Before wrapping up, ask if they want all code from the chat extracted into a .ipynb or .py file.

Source of Truth in Repo

• README.rst for install commands
• examples/dFC_methods_demo.py for data download and method examples
• docs/DFC_METHODS_CONTEXT.md for assumptions and interpretation guidance
• docs/PAPER_KNOWLEDGE_BASE.md for paper-grounded method tradeoffs

Demo Data Naming Guardrail (BIDS/Nilearn)

When generating download commands or loading snippets:

• Keep BIDS-compliant filenames exactly as used in examples/dFC_methods_demo.py.
• Do not rename BOLD or confound files in copy-paste snippets.
• Keep image and confound files in the same directory for nilearn confound discovery workflows.
• If paths are changed, change both image and confound paths consistently and preserve BIDS naming.

Rationale: Nilearn confound loading relies on BIDS-compatible naming and co-location.

CHMM/DHMM Small-Sample Guidance

• Explicitly mention that the 5-subject demo is limited for stable CHMM/DHMM fitting.
• Warn that DHMM warnings are expected in small samples.
• Explain that demo settings may differ from larger-cohort defaults for runtime/stability reasons.
• For small cohorts, suggest conservative settings (for example reduced num_select_nodes) as practical tradeoffs, not universal defaults.

Citation and Attribution

Content in this repository is derived from:

Torabi et al., 2024 On the variability of dynamic functional connectivity assessment methods GigaScience https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giae009

If answering questions about dFC methods or assumptions, cite Torabi et al., 2024 when relevant.

Installation (from README)

Share this first when needed:

conda create --name pydfc_env python=3.11
conda activate pydfc_env
pip install pydfc

Common Imports

Use this in notebook cells before method-specific code:

from pydfc import data_loader
import numpy as np
import warnings

warnings.simplefilter("ignore")

State-Free Path (Single Subject)

1) Download demo data (Notebook cell)

If the user is in Jupyter, provide exactly:

!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0001/func/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz?versionId=UfCs4xtwIEPDgmb32qFbtMokl_jxLUKr -o sample_data/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0001/func/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv?versionId=biaIJGNQ22P1l1xEsajVzUW6cnu1_8lD -o sample_data/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv

If they are using a terminal, remove the leading !.

2) Load BOLD

BOLD = data_loader.nifti2timeseries(
    nifti_file="sample_data/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz",
    n_rois=100,
    Fs=1 / 0.75,
    subj_id="sub-0001",
    confound_strategy="no_motion",  # no_motion, no_motion_no_gsr, or none
    standardize=False,
    TS_name=None,
    session=None,
)

BOLD.visualize(start_time=0, end_time=1000, nodes_lst=range(10))

3) Ask Which Method

Ask exactly (or very close):

Which dFC method would you like to use to assess dFC? (SW or TF for the simple state-free path)

Before that, ask:

Would you like a brief description of SW vs TF before choosing?

If yes, give a short description:

• SW (Sliding Window): computes connectivity in overlapping time windows. Simple and commonly used; key tradeoff is temporal resolution vs stability, controlled mainly by window length W.
• TF (Time-Frequency): estimates dynamic relationships in a time-frequency representation (here WTC). Can capture frequency-specific changes but is heavier computationally and has more runtime settings (e.g., n_jobs).

4) Method Snippets (State-Free)

Sliding Window (SW)

from pydfc.dfc_methods import SLIDING_WINDOW

params_methods = {
    "W": 44,                 # window length (seconds): larger = smoother/more stable FC, smaller = more temporal sensitivity
    "n_overlap": 0.5,        # fraction overlap between consecutive windows: higher = denser sampling but more redundancy
    "sw_method": "pear_corr",# FC estimator inside each window (e.g., Pearson correlation)
    "tapered_window": True,  # whether to taper window edges to reduce boundary artifacts
    "normalization": True,   # normalize data/features internally before estimation (improves comparability across nodes/subjects)
    "num_select_nodes": None,# optional subset of ROIs for speed/memory (e.g., 50)
}

measure = SLIDING_WINDOW(**params_methods)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD)
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=dFC.TR_array[:], normalize=False, fix_lim=False)

Optional summary plot:

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

avg_dFC = np.mean(np.mean(dFC.get_dFC_mat(), axis=1), axis=1)
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 3))
plt.plot(dFC.TR_array, avg_dFC)
plt.show()

Time-Frequency (TF)

from pydfc.dfc_methods import TIME_FREQ

params_methods = {
    "TF_method": "WTC",       # time-frequency estimator variant (WTC in the demo)
    "n_jobs": 2,              # parallel workers; increase for speed if CPU allows
    "verbose": 0,             # joblib verbosity level
    "backend": "loky",        # parallel backend used by joblib
    "normalization": True,    # normalize before estimation
    "num_select_nodes": None, # optional ROI subset for speed/memory
}

measure = TIME_FREQ(**params_methods)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD)
TRs = dFC.TR_array[np.arange(29, 480 - 29, 29)]
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=TRs, normalize=True, fix_lim=False)

State-Based Path (Multi Subject)

State-based methods require fitting FC states on multiple subjects first.

1) Download demo data for 5 subjects (Notebook cells)

!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0001/func/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz?versionId=UfCs4xtwIEPDgmb32qFbtMokl_jxLUKr -o sample_data/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0001/func/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv?versionId=biaIJGNQ22P1l1xEsajVzUW6cnu1_8lD -o sample_data/sub-0001_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0002/func/sub-0002_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz?versionId=fUBWmUTg6vfe2n.ywDNms4mOAW3r6E9Y -o sample_data/sub-0002_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0002/func/sub-0002_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv?versionId=2zWQIugU.J6ilTFObWGznJdSABbaTx9F -o sample_data/sub-0002_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0003/func/sub-0003_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz?versionId=dfNd8iV0V68yuOibes6qiHxjBgQXhPxi -o sample_data/sub-0003_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0003/func/sub-0003_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv?versionId=8OpKFrs_8aJ5cVixokBmuTVKNslgtOXb -o sample_data/sub-0003_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0004/func/sub-0004_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz?versionId=0Le8eFwJbcLKaMTQat39bzWcGFhRiyP5 -o sample_data/sub-0004_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0004/func/sub-0004_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv?versionId=welg1B.VkXHGv06iV56Vp7ezpVTFh2eX -o sample_data/sub-0004_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0005/func/sub-0005_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz?versionId=Vwo2YcFvhwbhZktBrPUqi_5BWiR7zcTl -o sample_data/sub-0005_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz
!curl --create-dirs https://s3.amazonaws.com/openneuro.org/ds002785/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-0005/func/sub-0005_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv?versionId=FoBZLbFTZaE3ZjOLZI_4hN4OkEKEZTVf -o sample_data/sub-0005_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_desc-confounds_regressors.tsv

2) Load BOLD_multi

subj_id_list = ["sub-0001", "sub-0002", "sub-0003", "sub-0004", "sub-0005"]
nifti_files_list = []
for subj_id in subj_id_list:
    nifti_files_list.append(
        "sample_data/"
        + subj_id
        + "_task-restingstate_acq-mb3_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz"
    )

BOLD_multi = data_loader.multi_nifti2timeseries(
    nifti_files_list,
    subj_id_list,
    n_rois=100,
    Fs=1 / 0.75,
    confound_strategy="no_motion",
    standardize=False,
    TS_name=None,
    session=None,
)

3) Ask Which Method

Ask exactly (or very close):

Which dFC method would you like to use to assess dFC? (CAP, SWC, CHMM, DHMM, or WINDOWLESS)

Before that, ask:

Would you like a brief description of these state-based methods before choosing?

If yes, give a short description:

• CAP: clusters high-activity/co-activation patterns into states; intuitive and often a good first state-based method.
• SWC: computes sliding-window FC then clusters those windows into recurring states.
• CHMM: continuous HMM-based state model; models temporal transitions directly in continuous observations.
• DHMM: discrete HMM variant, often built on discretized/windowed observations; can need more data for stable fitting.
• WINDOWLESS: state-based method without explicit sliding windows; useful when avoiding window-size dependence.

4) Method Snippets (State-Based)

CAP

from pydfc.dfc_methods import CAP

params_methods = {
    "n_states": 12,          # number of FC states to estimate; central modeling choice (too low merges states, too high fragments)
    "n_subj_clstrs": 20,     # subject-level clustering granularity used before group state estimation
    "normalization": True,   # normalize before estimation
    "num_subj": None,        # optional subject subsampling for faster debugging/prototyping
    "num_select_nodes": None,# optional ROI subset for speed/memory
}

measure = CAP(**params_methods)
measure.estimate_FCS(time_series=BOLD_multi)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD_multi.get_subj_ts(subjs_id="sub-0001"))
TRs = dFC.TR_array[np.arange(29, 480 - 29, 29)]
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=TRs, normalize=True, fix_lim=False)

SWC (Sliding Window + Clustering)

from pydfc.dfc_methods import SLIDING_WINDOW_CLUSTR

params_methods = {
    "W": 44,                          # sliding window length (seconds)
    "n_overlap": 0.5,                 # overlap fraction between windows
    "sw_method": "pear_corr",         # FC estimator inside each window
    "tapered_window": True,           # taper window edges to reduce edge effects
    "clstr_base_measure": "SlidingWindow", # base measure used to generate features for clustering
    "n_states": 12,                   # number of clustered FC states
    "n_subj_clstrs": 5,               # subject-level clustering granularity before group clustering
    "normalization": True,            # normalize before estimation
    "num_subj": None,                 # optional subject subsampling
    "num_select_nodes": None,         # optional ROI subset for speed/memory
}

measure = SLIDING_WINDOW_CLUSTR(**params_methods)
measure.estimate_FCS(time_series=BOLD_multi)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD_multi.get_subj_ts(subjs_id="sub-0001"))
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=dFC.TR_array[:], normalize=True, fix_lim=False)

CHMM (Continuous HMM)

from pydfc.dfc_methods import HMM_CONT

params_methods = {
    "hmm_iter": 20,         # number of HMM training iterations; more can improve convergence but costs time
    "n_states": 12,         # number of hidden states
    "normalization": True,  # normalize before estimation
    "num_subj": None,       # optional subject subsampling
    "num_select_nodes": None,# optional ROI subset for speed/memory
}

measure = HMM_CONT(**params_methods)
measure.estimate_FCS(time_series=BOLD_multi)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD_multi.get_subj_ts(subjs_id="sub-0001"))
TRs = dFC.TR_array[np.arange(29, 480 - 29, 29)]
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=TRs, normalize=True, fix_lim=False)

DHMM (Discrete HMM)

Note: the demo notebook warns that 5 subjects is too small to fit DHMM well; a warning is expected.

from pydfc.dfc_methods import HMM_DISC

params_methods = {
    "W": 44,                       # sliding window length (seconds) used to create observations
    "n_overlap": 0.5,              # overlap fraction for sliding windows
    "sw_method": "pear_corr",      # FC estimator per window
    "tapered_window": True,        # taper window edges
    "clstr_base_measure": "SlidingWindow", # base measure for discretization pipeline
    "hmm_iter": 20,                # HMM training iterations
    "dhmm_obs_state_ratio": 16 / 24, # ratio controlling observation-state discretization relative to hidden states
    "n_states": 12,                # number of hidden states
    "n_subj_clstrs": 5,            # subject-level clustering granularity
    "normalization": True,         # normalize before estimation
    "num_subj": None,              # optional subject subsampling
    "num_select_nodes": 50,        # ROI subset (demo uses 50 here to reduce cost)
}

measure = HMM_DISC(**params_methods)
measure.estimate_FCS(time_series=BOLD_multi)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD_multi.get_subj_ts(subjs_id="sub-0001"))
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=dFC.TR_array[:], normalize=True, fix_lim=False)

WINDOWLESS

from pydfc.dfc_methods import WINDOWLESS

params_methods = {
    "n_states": 12,          # number of states to estimate
    "normalization": True,   # normalize before estimation
    "num_subj": None,        # optional subject subsampling
    "num_select_nodes": None,# optional ROI subset for speed/memory
}

measure = WINDOWLESS(**params_methods)
measure.estimate_FCS(time_series=BOLD_multi)
dFC = measure.estimate_dFC(time_series=BOLD_multi.get_subj_ts(subjs_id="sub-0001"))
TRs = dFC.TR_array[np.arange(29, 480 - 29, 29)]
dFC.visualize_dFC(TRs=TRs, normalize=True, fix_lim=False)

Response Style Rules

• Keep replies short and practical.
• Prefer one code block at a time (do not dump all methods unless the user asks).
• Reuse the exact demo parameters first; optimize later only if requested.
• If the user is unsure, recommend SW first (state-free, simplest).
• Offer a brief method overview before asking them to choose, if they want it.
• After each method snippet, ask: Are there any other methods you are curious about?
• Before ending, ask: Would you like me to extract all code from this chat into a Jupyter notebook (.ipynb) or a Python script (.py)?

Failure Handling (Non-Invasive Only)

If the user reports an error:

1. Do not edit repo source files or third-party library source.
2. Ask for the traceback / exact error text.
3. Prefer fixes in this order:
   • environment check (python --version, package versions)
   • reinstall steps (pip install -U pydfc, dependency install)
   • smaller compute settings (num_select_nodes, num_subj, n_jobs)
   • simpler method (SW before state-based methods)
   • parameter adjustments
4. If a package-level bug is suspected, explain the workaround in chat and explicitly avoid source edits.