name: user-stories description: "Analyzes a codebase and breaks down a goal into implementable user stories with clear acceptance criteria. Use when planning a new feature, estimating work, or creating a development roadmap. Outputs structured stories to .context/[goal-slug]-plan.md ordered by dependency. Filename is generated from the goal (kebab-case, 3-5 words). Do NOT implement anything - only analyze and plan." argument-hint: <goal-description> [--format=json|gherkin] disable-model-invocation: false user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Bash code: fork agent: Explore

User Stories - Codebase Analysis & Story Breakdown

Analyze a codebase and break down a goal into small, atomic, implementable user stories. Do NOT implement anything — only analyze and plan.

Input

If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask: "What goal would you like to break down into user stories? You can optionally add --format=gherkin for BDD-style output."

Otherwise, extract the goal and optional format flag (--format=json default, or --format=gherkin). If the format is invalid: "Invalid format. Use --format=json (default) or --format=gherkin for BDD-style output."

Workflow

1. Explore the codebase with Glob/Grep/Read: architecture, patterns, frameworks, similar existing features
2. Decompose the goal into 3–10 atomic user stories, each completable in one coding session (2–4 hours max)
3. Sequence stories by technical and logical dependency — earlier stories enable later ones
4. Estimate complexity per story: XS (<1h, single file), S (1–2h), M (2–4h), L (4–8h), XL (break it down further)
5. Generate filename from the goal (see naming rules)
6. Write the plan to .context/[slug]-plan.md using JSON or Gherkin format
7. Verify all stories have clear acceptance criteria and reasonable scope

Error Recovery

• Goal too vague: ask the user to clarify scope before proceeding
• Goal too broad (>10 stories): suggest splitting into separate plans
• No relevant codebase patterns found: note in Context Summary and plan from first principles
• Story too large (XL+): decompose into sub-stories before continuing
• Fewer than 3 stories: verify granularity is sufficient for the goal

Output File Naming

Generate a kebab-case slug from the goal:

• Remove articles (a, an, the, um, uma, o, a, os, as)
• Keep 3–5 keywords (nouns, verbs, key technologies)
• Lowercase, hyphens for spaces, append -plan.md
• Save to .context/ directory (create if needed)

JSON Format (Default)

Create the plan file with this structure:

# Development Plan: [Goal Summary]

**Generated**: [ISO Date]  
**Goal**: $ARGUMENTS

## Context Summary

[Current codebase state, relevant technologies, key architectural decisions]

## User Stories

```json
[
  {
    "id": "US-001",
    "title": "Story title in user voice",
    "description": "As a [user type], I want [goal] so that [benefit]. Implementation details...",
    "acceptanceCriteria": [
      "Specific, verifiable criterion 1",
      "Specific, verifiable criterion 2",
      "Specific, verifiable criterion 3"
    ],
    "priority": 1,
    "complexity": "S",
    "dependencies": [],
    "filesToTouch": ["path/to/file1.ts", "path/to/file2.ts"],
    "notes": "Any technical notes or gotchas"
  }
]

Implementation Notes

• [Key insight about architecture]
• [Potential risks or blockers]
• [Suggested testing approach]

Definition of Done

• All acceptance criteria met
• Tests written and passing
• Code reviewed
• Documentation updated (if needed)

See [example-output.md](example-output.md) for a complete JSON example.

## Gherkin Format

When `--format=gherkin` is specified, output Feature/Scenario blocks instead of JSON. Each user story becomes a Feature with Scenarios for each acceptance criterion. Include metadata comments (`# Complexity`, `# Dependencies`, `# Files`) above each Feature block. All Gherkin output must be in English regardless of input language.

See [example-gherkin-output.md](example-gherkin-output.md) for the complete template and a six-feature example.