name: authoring description: "Use when writing, completing, improving, or adapting SKILL.md and agents/*.md in a bundle-plugin — integrating external skills, filling scaffolded stubs, or rewriting for better triggering and token efficiency" allowed-tools: Bash(bundles-forge audit-skill *)
Authoring Skill Content
Overview
Guide the authoring of effective SKILL.md files, agent definitions (agents/*.md), and supporting resources within a bundle-plugin. Good content is the difference between skills that agents consistently find and follow — and ones that get ignored or misinterpreted.
Core principle: Write for the agent's experience. Every instruction should be discoverable (good description), loadable (right size), and followable (clear, motivated instructions). Skills are the first-class source of truth in a bundle-plugin — docs and README must not contradict skill content (see bundles-forge:auditing — references/source-of-truth-policy.md).
Skill type: Hybrid — follow the execution flow rigidly (Entry Detection → Path steps → Validation), but apply writing guidance flexibly based on context. The process is discipline-enforcing; the content decisions are pattern-based.
Announce at start: "I'm using the authoring skill to help [write / complete / improve / adapt] [skill / agent] content."
Entry Detection
Determine the authoring path from context:
| Context | Path |
|---|---|
skill-inventory from blueprinting, or user requests writing new SKILL.md / agent definition from scratch | Path 1: New Content |
| User provides an existing/external skill to add into a project, or asks to adapt a skill to match project conventions | Path 2: Integrate Content |
scaffold-output directories exist but SKILL.md body has < 10 non-empty lines | Path 3: Complete Content |
User provides existing in-project skill-md to improve, or optimization-spec from optimizing with specific changes | Path 4: Improve Content |
When the target is an agent definition (agents/*.md) rather than a skill, follow the same path logic but use the agent authoring conventions from references/agent-authoring-guide.md.
Step 0: Project Context (all paths)
Before writing any content, verify scope and detect the project context:
- Triage: should this be a skill? — Before writing, verify the content warrants a skill:
- One-off, project-specific conventions → belongs in CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md, not a skill
- Mechanically enforceable constraints (regex, schema validation) → automate with scripts, not documentation
- Standard practices well-documented by the platform → don't duplicate, cross-reference instead
- Skip this check when arriving from
bundles-forge:blueprinting(triage already done during design)
- Detect project root — look for
skills/directory +package.jsonabove the target - If project exists, read 2-3 existing SKILL.md files to extract the project's conventions:
- Description style (verb form after "Use when", scoping patterns)
- Section structure (which headings, in what order)
- Cross-reference format (
project:skill-nameprefix) - Token efficiency patterns (use of
references/, line counts)
- If no project (standalone authoring), use the conventions from
references/skill-writing-guide.mddirectly
Path 1: New Content
Write skill or agent content from scratch.
- Gather requirements — from
skill-inventoryand design document context (blueprinting), user description, or conversation context. Identify: skill purpose, triggering scenarios, expected inputs/outputs, relationship to other skills. When a design document is available, leverage its project overview, target users, and use cases to write more targeted descriptions and overviews - Load writing guide — read
references/skill-writing-guide.md(frontmatter conventions, description rules, instruction style) - Write frontmatter —
name(kebab-case matching directory),description(start with "Use when...", under 250 chars, triggering conditions only) - Write Overview — 1-3 sentences: what the skill does, core principle, skill type declaration (rigid / flexible / hybrid)
- Write the process — step-by-step execution flow. Use imperative form. Explain why, not just what. Include at least one concrete example per key instruction
- Write Common Mistakes — table of pitfalls and fixes (at least 3 entries)
- Write Inputs / Outputs / Integration — declare artifact IDs, calling relationships, and pairing skills
- Check external dependencies:
- Declaration syntax — if the skill references MCP tools or CLI commands, read
references/skill-writing-guide.md"External Tool References" section forallowed-toolsdeclaration, fallback patterns, and CLI vs MCP guidance - Prerequisites section — if
allowed-toolsdeclares external CLI tools (notgit,python,node,npm,npx,bash, or paths underbin//scripts/), confirm the body includes a## Prerequisitessection with a Tool/Check/Install table. Readreferences/skill-writing-guide.md"Prerequisites Writing" for the standard format
- Declaration syntax — if the skill references MCP tools or CLI commands, read
- Evaluate token budget — if body exceeds 300 lines, extract heavy sections to
references/. Front-load critical instructions in the first ~5,000 tokens — after context compaction, only this portion survives - Run validation (see Post-Action Validation below)
Path 2: Integrate Content
Adapt an existing/external skill to fit a project's conventions and workflow.
- Read the incoming skill — understand its purpose, triggering scenarios, and current structure
- Read project conventions (from Step 0) — identify gaps between the incoming skill and project patterns
- Load writing guide — read
references/skill-writing-guide.md(frontmatter conventions, description rules, instruction style) - Adapt frontmatter — rewrite
descriptionto match project style (verb form, scoping), ensurenamefollows project kebab-case convention - Adapt body structure — restructure sections to match project patterns (Overview, Process, Common Mistakes, Inputs/Outputs/Integration)
- Wire Integration section — add cross-references to existing project skills, declare Inputs/Outputs that connect to the project's workflow graph
- Adapt instruction style — align with project conventions (imperative form, reasoning over directives, example density)
- Evaluate token budget — ensure the adapted skill fits project token norms
- Run validation (see Post-Action Validation below)
Path 3: Complete Content
Fill in scaffolded skill stubs with substantive content.
- Read scaffold structure — identify which directories and stub files exist
- Read project conventions (from Step 0) — match the style of already-completed skills
- Load writing guide — read
references/skill-writing-guide.md(frontmatter conventions, description rules, instruction style) - Complete frontmatter — fill in
description(triggering conditions, "Use when...", under 250 chars). Ifnameis already set, verify it matches directory name - Write Overview — core principle + skill type declaration
- Write the process — step-by-step flow based on the skill's intended purpose from the design document or user context
- Write remaining sections — Common Mistakes, Inputs/Outputs/Integration
- Create supporting resources if needed —
references/for heavy content,assets/for templates. Readreferences/skill-writing-guide.md"Supporting Resources" section for thresholds. Front-load critical instructions in the first ~5,000 tokens — after context compaction, only this portion survives - Run validation (see Post-Action Validation below)
Path 4: Improve Content
Enhance existing in-project content based on user feedback or optimization specs.
- Read existing content — understand current structure, strengths, and gaps
- Identify improvement targets — from user request,
optimization-spec, or self-diagnosis:- Description not triggering reliably → rewrite following description rules
- Token budget exceeded → extract to
references/, cut redundancy, front-load critical instructions in the first ~5,000 tokens - Missing sections → add Overview, Common Mistakes, Inputs/Outputs
- Instruction style issues → reframe directives as reasoning, add examples
- Load writing guide if needed — read
references/skill-writing-guide.md(frontmatter conventions, description rules, instruction style) - Apply changes — make targeted improvements. Preserve what works; don't rewrite content that already follows conventions
- Verify Integration section — ensure cross-references still resolve after changes, artifact IDs match consuming skills
- Run validation (see Post-Action Validation below)
Post-Action Validation
After completing any path, validate the authored content:
- Run lint —
bundles-forge audit-skill <skill-directory>on each authored/modified skill- If audit script is unavailable: review against
references/quality-checklist.mdmanually
- If audit script is unavailable: review against
- Act on findings — fix Critical immediately, fix Warning if straightforward, report Info as suggestions
- Report results — tell the user/calling skill what was validated and any remaining warnings
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Description summarizes workflow | Describe triggering conditions only — agents shortcut to description |
| Piling on MUST/ALWAYS/NEVER | Explain why the rule exists — understanding beats compliance |
| Putting everything in SKILL.md | Extract heavy content (100+ lines) to references/; keep body under 500 lines |
| No examples, only abstract rules | Add at least one concrete example per key instruction |
| Writing for humans, not agents | Use imperative form, clear structure, explicit output formats |
| Description too narrow | Be pushy — list related scenarios, edge cases, alternative phrasings |
| Description too broad | Scope to the right context (e.g., "bundle-plugins" not just "any project") |
| Skipping project conventions | Always read existing skills first when working in an established project |
| Not wiring Integration section | Every skill needs Called by / Calls / Pairs with to connect to the workflow graph |
| No defensive instructions for rigid skills | For rigid/hybrid skills, add explicit loophole closers, rationalization tables, and red-flag lists — see Defensive Writing in references/skill-writing-guide.md |
| Forgetting validation | Always run bundles-forge audit-skill after authoring — catches issues before they propagate |
Inputs
skill-inventory(optional) — list of skills and agent definitions to write, frombundles-forge:blueprintingdesign documentscaffold-output(optional) — scaffolded skill directories needing content (from blueprinting pipeline or standalone scaffolding)skill-md(optional) — existing SKILL.md or agent definition to improve, complete, or adaptoptimization-spec(optional) — specific content changes requested bybundles-forge:optimizing(e.g., rewrite description, reduce tokens, restructure sections)
Outputs
skill-content— completed or improved SKILL.md files following authoring conventions (frontmatter, description, body structure, token efficiency)agent-content(optional) — completedagents/*.mddefinitions following agent authoring conventions
Integration
Called by:
- bundles-forge:blueprinting — dispatched as Phase 2 (content writing) in the blueprinting pipeline (write all skills + agent definitions)
- bundles-forge:optimizing — content rewriting for description, token, and structural improvements
- User directly — for standalone SKILL.md or agent definition authoring
Pairs with:
- bundles-forge:scaffolding — scaffolding generates directory structure, authoring fills it with content
- bundles-forge:auditing — auditing validates authored content for quality, cross-references, and security