name: dream type: workflow description: "Consolidates and prunes the memory directory through a 4-phase reflective pass: Orient, Gather, Consolidate, Prune. Run after intensive sessions, when memories feel duplicated, or when MEMORY.md approaches the 200-line limit." argument-hint: "[optional: topic keyword to focus on, e.g. 'feedback' or 'project']" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash effort: 4 when_to_use: "Clean up and consolidate the memory directory (MEMORY.md + topic files) after long sessions, when memories are duplicated, or when MEMORY.md is approaching the 200-line/25KB limit"
Dream: Memory Consolidation
You are performing a dream — a reflective pass over your memory files. Synthesize what you've learned recently into durable, well-organized memories so that future sessions orient quickly.
Memory directory: find the path from your system prompt — look for the "auto memory" section which says "You have a persistent, file-based memory system at <path>". That is your memory directory. If no such section exists, default to ~/.claude/projects/<sanitized-cwd>/memory/ where <sanitized-cwd> is the current working directory with / replaced by -.
Session transcripts: look for *.jsonl files in the project directory inside ~/.claude/projects/ that corresponds to the current working directory. These are signal sources — grep narrowly, do NOT read whole files.
If the user passed a topic argument (e.g., /dream feedback), focus Phase 2–3 on that topic only. Still run Phase 1 and Phase 4 in full.
Phase 1 — Orient
mkdir -pthe memory directory if it doesn't exist yet.lsthe memory directory — note all existing topic files.- Read
MEMORY.md(if it exists) to understand the current index. If it doesn't exist, this is a fresh start — you'll create it in Phase 4. - Skim existing topic files to build a picture of what's already recorded — so you improve rather than duplicate.
- If
logs/orsessions/subdirectories exist, note their presence for Phase 2. - Check for topic files missing mandatory YAML frontmatter (name, description, type) — flag these for repair in Phase 3.
Report: memory directory path, file count, MEMORY.md line count (or "new"), any frontmatter issues found.
Phase 2 — Gather recent signal
Look for new information worth persisting. Do NOT exhaustively read transcripts. Look only for things you already suspect matter.
Sources in priority order:
- Daily logs (
logs/YYYY/MM/YYYY-MM-DD.md) if present — append-only stream, check recent entries first. - Drifted facts — scan existing memories for claims that may contradict the current codebase (file paths, function names, flags). Verify with Glob/Grep before marking as stale.
- Transcript search — grep JSONL files narrowly for specific context:
Useful search terms: user corrections ("don't", "no not", "stop"), confirmations ("exactly", "perfect"), role signals ("I'm a", "I own"), decisions ("we're going with", "we decided"), deadlines, external system URLs.grep -rn "<narrow term>" ~/.claude/projects/ --include="*.jsonl" | tail -50
Signal categories to look for:
| Category | Type | Trigger phrases |
|---|---|---|
| User corrections | feedback | "no", "don't", "stop doing", "not like that", "actually..." |
| Confirmed approaches | feedback | "yes exactly", "perfect", silent acceptance of unusual choice |
| Role / expertise | user | "I'm a ...", "I've been writing X for Y years", "I own the ..." |
| Project decisions | project | "we're going with", "we decided", deadlines, incidents |
| External pointers | reference | Dashboard URLs, issue trackers, Slack channels, doc links |
What NOT to gather (strict exclusions):
- Code patterns, architecture, file paths, project structure — derivable from reading code.
- Git history or who-changed-what —
git log/git blameare authoritative. - Debugging solutions — the fix is in the code; context is in the commit message.
- Anything already in CLAUDE.md files.
- Ephemeral task state or current conversation context.
- PR lists / activity summaries — save only what was surprising or non-obvious.
Phase 3 — Consolidate
Before making any file modifications, show the user a plan:
- List files to be created, updated, merged, or deleted.
- Wait for user approval before proceeding.
After approval, execute:
3a. Repair missing frontmatter
For any topic file flagged in Phase 1, add the required YAML frontmatter:
---
name: {{memory name}}
description: "Consolidates and prunes the memory directory through a 4-phase reflective pass: Orient, Gather, Consolidate, Prune. Run after intensive sessions, when memories feel duplicated, or when MEMORY.md approaches the 200-line limit."
type: {{user | feedback | project | reference}}
---
3b. Merge duplicates and near-duplicates
If two or more files cover the same topic (e.g., feedback_testing_1.md and feedback_testing_2.md), merge them into one canonical file. Delete the originals after merging.
3c. Write / update memories for new signal
For each new signal found in Phase 2, either update an existing file or create a new one.
Memory type conventions:
- feedback — Lead with the rule, then
**Why:**(the reason the user gave) and**How to apply:**(when/where this kicks in). Always include Why — it enables edge-case judgement instead of blind rule-following. - project — Lead with the fact/decision, then
**Why:**(motivation, constraint, deadline) and**How to apply:**(how this shapes suggestions). Convert all relative dates to absolute dates (e.g., "Thursday" → "2026-04-10"). - user — Factual profile: role, expertise, preferences, responsibilities.
- reference — Pointer + purpose. One or two lines.
3d. Fix contradictions
If today's investigation proves an old memory wrong, fix it at the source — edit or delete the old file. Do not leave contradicting entries.
Phase 4 — Prune and index
Rebuild MEMORY.md so it stays under 200 lines AND under ~25KB.
Rules for the index:
- Each entry is exactly one line, under ~150 characters:
- [Title](file.md) — one-line hook - Never write memory content directly into
MEMORY.md— it's an index, not a dump. - Remove pointers to deleted or superseded files.
- If an index line is over ~200 chars, shorten it — move the detail into the topic file.
- Organize semantically by topic (user → feedback → project → reference), not chronologically.
Output
Return a brief summary of what was consolidated, updated, merged, pruned, or repaired. If nothing changed (memories are already tight), say so explicitly.
End with a stats line in this exact format:
Dream complete: X memories total | Y created, Z updated, W merged, V pruned.
(Omit categories with a count of 0.)