name: code-review-expert description: Comprehensive code review expertise. Use when reviewing code, evaluating architecture, or assessing quality. Triggers on review, evaluate, assess, audit, code quality, best practices.
Code Review Expert
Comprehensive code review expertise for evaluating architecture and quality.
When to Use
- Reviewing code changes before merge
- Evaluating architecture decisions
- Assessing code quality
- Auditing for security issues
- Performing pre-commit reviews
Workflow
Step 1: Initial Scan (10%)
Review structure and architecture overview.
Step 2: Top-Down Review (40%)
Architecture → Modules → Functions.
Step 3: Multi-Perspective (30%)
Review as Architect, PM, QA, UX.
Step 4: Deep Dives (15%)
Focus on security and performance.
Step 5: Report (5%)
Summarize and prioritize findings.
Review Phases
Phase 1 (10%): Initial scan - structure, architecture
Phase 2 (40%): Top-down - Architecture → Modules → Functions
Phase 3 (30%): Multi-perspective - Architect, PM, QA, UX
Phase 4 (15%): Deep dives - Security, performance
Phase 5 (5%): Report - Summarize, prioritize
Severity
| Level | Action |
|---|---|
| 🔴 Critical | Must fix before deploy |
| 🟠 High | Fix this sprint |
| 🟡 Medium | Fix next sprint |
| 🟢 Low | Backlog |
Quick Checklist
- No
anytypes - Error handling complete
- Input validation present
- No hardcoded secrets
- Parameterized queries
- Async errors handled