name: slide-excellence description: Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones. argument-hint: "[TEX filename]" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task"] context: fork
Slide Excellence Review
Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of research presentation slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.
Steps
1. Identify the File
Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in docs/conferences/.
2. Run Review Agents in Parallel
Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)
- Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images
- Save:
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md
Agent 2: Econometric Fidelity Review (econometrics-reviewer)
- Every quantitative claim on slides must be traceable to the paper (
docs/overleaf/_main.tex) - Check: coefficients, standard errors, sample sizes, p-values match paper tables/figures
- Check: identification strategy correctly described (hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD, upstream/downstream)
- Check: treatment variables defined correctly (spill_count/spill_hrs, 12/24hr counting methodology)
- Check: confidence intervals and significance stars consistent with paper
- Check: no causal language without identification support
- Save:
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_econometrics_report.md
Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)
- Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations
- Save:
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md
Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)
- Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics
- Save:
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md
Agent 5: Substance Review (domain correctness)
- Verify environmental economics claims are accurate
- Check EDM/water company institutional context is correct
- Verify spatial econometrics descriptions match methodology
- Check hedonic pricing theory correctly invoked
- Verify England housing market characterisation
- Save:
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md
3. Synthesize Combined Summary
# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]
## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]
| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Econometric Fidelity | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |
| Substance | | | |
### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps
Quality Score Rubric
| Score | Critical | Medium | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 0-2 | 0-5 | Ready to present |
| Good | 3-5 | 6-15 | Minor refinements |
| Needs Work | 6-10 | 16-30 | Significant revision |
| Poor | 11+ | 31+ | Major restructuring |