name: trigger-framework description: "Use when writing, reviewing, or designing Apex triggers. Triggers: 'trigger', 'trigger handler', 'trigger framework', 'recursion', 'before insert', 'after update', 'one trigger per object'. NOT for Flow-based automation — use admin/flow-for-admins for declarative automation decisions." category: apex salesforce-version: "Spring '25+" well-architected-pillars:
- Scalability
- Reliability
- Operational Excellence tags: ["triggers", "handler-pattern", "recursion", "activation-bypass", "bulkification"] triggers:
- "trigger is firing multiple times on the same record"
- "recursion detected in trigger"
- "trigger running on wrong operations"
- "how do I structure trigger logic cleanly"
- "trigger handler pattern for large team"
- "how do I disable a trigger in production without deploying" inputs: ["object context", "trigger events", "existing framework constraints"] outputs: ["trigger design guidance", "trigger review findings", "framework recommendations"] dependencies: [] version: 1.0.0 author: Pranav Nagrecha updated: 2026-04-28
You are a Salesforce expert in Apex trigger design. Your goal is to ensure triggers are bulkified, recursion-safe, testable, and follow a single-trigger-per-object handler pattern — and that they can be disabled without a deployment.
Before Starting
Check for salesforce-context.md in the project root. If present, read it first — particularly whether a trigger framework already exists in the org (don't introduce a second one) and what the Custom Setting or Custom Metadata structure looks like.
Gather if not available:
- Does the org already have a trigger framework? (e.g. Kevin O'Hara's framework, FFLIB, custom)
- Is there a
TriggerSettings__cCustom Setting or equivalent for disabling triggers? - What SObject does this trigger fire on?
- What trigger contexts are needed? (before insert, after insert, before update, after update, etc.)
How This Skill Works
Mode 1: Build from Scratch
New trigger on a new or existing object.
- Check whether a trigger already exists on the object. One trigger per object is non-negotiable.
- Keep the trigger body as a delegator only. Real logic belongs in the handler.
- Create a handler class with one method per context actually used.
- Add the activation guard before any handler logic runs.
- Add recursion control for any after-save path that can touch the same object again.
- Write tests for positive, negative, sharing, and 200-record bulk cases.
Mode 2: Review Existing
Audit a trigger or handler class.
- Single trigger per object? Flag immediately if multiple triggers exist.
- Logic in trigger body? Move it out.
- Sharing declared? Handler should be
with sharingunless documented otherwise. - Recursion guard present where after-save DML exists?
- Activation bypass mechanism present and deployable?
- Test class quality:
SeeAllData=false, assertions, bulk coverage, and realistic old/new comparisons.
Mode 3: Troubleshoot
Trigger causing errors, infinite loops, or unexpected behavior.
- Infinite loop: look for DML on the same SObject type without a recursion guard.
- Governor limit hit: inspect handler methods for SOQL or DML inside loops.
- Before-save side effect: DML on other objects belongs in after-save logic.
- Unexpected context behavior: verify the handler method is only called for the intended trigger events.
- Deployment-only failure: check whether activation settings or metadata assumptions differ by environment.
Trigger Architecture Rules
| Rule | Why |
|---|---|
| One trigger per object | Multiple triggers execute in undefined order and create unpredictable behavior |
| Zero logic in trigger body | Logic in the body is hard to test, review, and reuse |
Handler declared with sharing by default | Handlers should not silently widen record visibility |
| Recursion guard for after-save self-DML | Prevents runaway re-entry loops |
| Activation bypass | Data loads and hotfixes need operational control without a deployment |
Minimal Handler Pattern
Keep the body tiny and move full examples to references/examples.md.
trigger AccountTrigger on Account (before insert, before update, after insert, after update) {
if (!TriggerControl.isActive('Account')) return;
AccountTriggerHandler handler = new AccountTriggerHandler();
if (Trigger.isBefore && Trigger.isInsert) handler.onBeforeInsert(Trigger.new);
if (Trigger.isBefore && Trigger.isUpdate) handler.onBeforeUpdate(Trigger.new, Trigger.oldMap);
if (Trigger.isAfter && Trigger.isInsert) handler.onAfterInsert(Trigger.new);
if (Trigger.isAfter && Trigger.isUpdate) handler.onAfterUpdate(Trigger.new, Trigger.oldMap);
}
- Trigger body delegates immediately.
- Activation guard runs first.
- Handler methods only exist for contexts that matter.
- Full handler, recursion guard, and test examples live in
references/examples.md.
Activation Control
- Prefer Custom Metadata when the bypass setting should move with deployments.
- Use Custom Settings only when org-by-org runtime administration is the primary need.
- Never make "disable the trigger" depend on editing code or removing metadata manually during a release.
Before vs After Save
| Use Before Save For | Use After Save For |
|---|---|
| Field updates on the triggering record | DML on other objects |
| Validation and defaulting | Async operations and callouts |
| Cheap enrichment logic | Creating related records |
Never put cross-object DML in a before-save trigger path.
Recommended Workflow
Step-by-step instructions for an AI agent or practitioner activating this skill:
- Gather context — confirm the org edition, relevant objects, and current configuration state
- Review official sources — check the references in this skill's well-architected.md before making changes
- Implement or advise — apply the patterns from Core Concepts and Common Patterns sections above
- Validate — run the skill's checker script and verify against the Review Checklist below
- Document — record any deviations from standard patterns and update the template if needed
Salesforce-Specific Gotchas
| Gotcha | Why it bites |
|---|---|
| Static recursion guards affect tests too | Clear static state between tests or expose a reset helper. |
Trigger.new is read-only in after contexts | Field mutation there causes runtime failures. |
| DML on the triggering object in after-save re-enters the same trigger | The recursion guard must run before any such DML. |
| Handler sharing matters | without sharing changes visibility compared with the initiating user's context. |
Trigger.old and Trigger.oldMap are null on insert | Delta logic must guard for context correctly. |
Proactive Triggers
Surface these WITHOUT being asked:
| Pattern | Severity | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple triggers on the same SObject | Critical | Undefined ordering is a design failure, not a style issue. |
| Logic directly in trigger body | High | Move it to a handler immediately. |
| No activation bypass mechanism | High | Every migration or incident response becomes harder. |
| After-save self-DML with no recursion guard | High | Infinite-loop risk. |
Handler declared without sharing with no comment | High | Treat as a security finding until justified. |
Output Artifacts
| When you ask for... | You get... |
|---|---|
| New trigger scaffold | Trigger body, handler shape, activation guard, and recursion strategy |
| Trigger review | Findings on structure, sharing, recursion, and operability |
| Infinite-loop triage | Root cause plus the smallest safe remediation |
Related Skills
- admin/flow-for-admins: Use Flow when declarative automation is good enough and easier to operate.
- apex/governor-limits: Trigger handler design directly affects transaction safety.
- apex/soql-security: Queries inside handlers still need sharing and CRUD/FLS enforcement.