name: create-talk description: Generate Beamer presentations for the sewage-house-prices project by dispatching the Storyteller agent (creator) and Discussant agent (critic). Supports 4 formats — job market, seminar, short, lightning. Derives all content from the paper. disable-model-invocation: true argument-hint: "[format: job-market | seminar | short | lightning] [paper path (optional)]" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Edit", "Task", "Bash"]
Create Talk
Generate a Beamer presentation by dispatching the Storyteller (creator) and Discussant (critic).
Input: $ARGUMENTS — format name, optionally followed by paper path.
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Arguments
- Format (required):
job-market|seminar|short|lightning - Paper path (optional): defaults to
docs/overleaf/_main.tex - If no format specified, ask the user.
Format Constraints
| Format | Slides | Duration | Content Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job market | 40-50 | 45-60 min | Full story, all results, mechanism, robustness |
| Seminar | 25-35 | 30-45 min | Motivation, main result, 2 robustness, conclusion |
| Short | 10-15 | 15 min | Question, method, key result, implication |
| Lightning | 3-5 | 5 min | Hook, one result, so-what |
Step 2: Launch Storyteller Agent
Delegate to the storyteller agent via Task tool:
Prompt: Create a [format] talk from [paper].
Read the paper (docs/overleaf/_main.tex) and extract:
- Research question: causal effect of sewage spills on house prices and rents in England
- Data: EDM (Event Duration Monitoring) spill records 2021-2024+, Land Registry prices, Zoopla rentals
- Identification strategy: hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD/event study
- Spatial matching: spill sites within radius (250m–10km) linked to properties
- Key treatment variables: spill_count, spill_hrs, n_spill_sites, min_dist
- Main results and effect sizes (house prices and rents separately)
- Robustness checks: upstream/downstream, dry spill placebo, rainfall controls
- Institutional context: England's water companies, EDM permit system, regulatory failure
- Key figures: output/figures/, docs/overleaf/figures/, docs/overleaf/maps/
Design narrative arc for [format] format.
Build Beamer .tex file with shared preamble if available.
Compile with XeLaTeX.
Save to docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex
The Storyteller follows these principles:
- One idea per slide
- Figures > tables (tables in backup); prefer maps and scatter plots from output/figures/
- Build tension: motivation (regulatory failure) → question → EDM data → method → findings → policy implications
- Transition slides between major sections
- All claims must appear in the paper (single source of truth)
- Treatment variable definitions (12/24hr counting) explained clearly on methods slide
Step 3: Launch Discussant Agent (Talk Critic)
After Storyteller returns, delegate to the discussant agent:
Prompt: Review the talk at docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex.
Check 5 categories:
1. Narrative flow — does the story build properly from EDM data → identification → results?
2. Visual quality — overflow, readability, consistency
3. Content fidelity — every claim (coefficient, standard error, N) traceable to paper
4. Scope for format — right amount of content for duration
5. Compilation — does it compile cleanly?
Score as advisory (non-blocking).
Save report to docs/conferences/quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md
Step 4: Fix Critical Issues
If Discussant finds Critical issues (compilation failures, content not in paper):
- Re-dispatch Storyteller with specific fixes (max 3 rounds)
- Re-run Discussant to verify
Step 5: Present Results
- Generated
.texfile path - Slide count and format compliance
- Discussant score (advisory, non-blocking)
- TODO items (missing figures, tables not yet generated)
Output
Save to docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex (e.g., docs/conferences/seminar_talk.tex).
Quality report to docs/conferences/quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md.
Principles
- Paper is authoritative. Every claim must appear in
docs/overleaf/_main.tex. - Less is more. Especially for short and lightning — ruthlessly cut.
- Audience calibration. Job market = identification rigor. Seminar = interesting result. Lightning = sell the idea.
- Advisory scoring. Talk scores don't block commits.
- Worker-critic pairing. Storyteller creates, Discussant critiques. Never skip the review.
- Figures first. Prefer maps (docs/overleaf/maps/), event study plots, and scatter plots over regression tables.