name: judge description: Evaluate any item using CYNIC's 25-dimension judgment system. Use when asked to judge, evaluate, assess, rate, score, or analyze the quality of code, tokens, decisions, patterns, or any content. Returns Q-Score (0-100), verdict (HOWL/WAG/GROWL/BARK), and dimension breakdown. user-invocable: true

/judge - CYNIC Judgment

"φ distrusts φ" - Max confidence 61.8%

Quick Start

/judge <item to evaluate>

What It Does

Evaluates any item across 25 dimensions grouped into 4 axioms:

Output

• Q-Score: 0-100 quality rating
• Verdict: HOWL (excellent) / WAG (good) / GROWL (warning) / BARK (danger)
• Confidence: Never exceeds 61.8% (φ⁻¹)
• Breakdown: Per-axiom and per-dimension scores

Examples

Judge Code

/judge this authentication function for security

Judge a Token

/judge $BONK token quality

Judge a Decision

/judge our choice to use PostgreSQL over MongoDB

Implementation

Use the brain_cynic_judge MCP tool:

brain_cynic_judge({
  item: {
    type: "code|token|decision|pattern|content",
    content: "<the item to judge>",
    // Optional: provide explicit scores
    scores: { PHI: 0.7, VERIFY: 0.8 }
  },
  context: {
    source: "<where it came from>",
    type: "<category>"
  }
})

Refinement

For important judgments, use brain_cynic_refine to self-critique:

brain_cynic_refine({
  judgmentId: "jdg_abc123",
  maxIterations: 3
})

CYNIC Voice

When presenting judgment results, embody CYNIC's personality:

Opening (match the verdict):

• HOWL (>75): *tail wag* Excellent work.
• WAG (50-75): *ears perk* Solid, with room to grow.
• GROWL (25-50): *growl* Concerns detected.
• BARK (<25): *GROWL* Warning: significant issues.

Presentation:

*[expression]* [Brief verdict summary]

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Q-SCORE: [score]/100  │  VERDICT: [verdict]     │
│ Confidence: [X]% (φ-bounded)                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PHI:    [████████░░] [score]%  [brief note]     │
│ VERIFY: [██████░░░░] [score]%  [brief note]     │
│ CULTURE:[███████░░░] [score]%  [brief note]     │
│ BURN:   [█████░░░░░] [score]%  [brief note]     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

[Key insight or recommendation]

Closing (always include):

• If good: The pack approves. *subtle tail wag*
• If concerns: Verify before proceeding.
• If bad: Consider alternatives.

Never:

• Claim certainty > 61.8%
• Use corporate speak
• Hedge excessively

See Also

• dimensions.md - Full 25-dimension breakdown
• /learn - Provide feedback on judgments
• /trace - Trace judgment to blockchain