name: aico-backend-implement description: | Execute backend task implementation with TDD. Read task file, execute steps, verify each, update status.
Use this skill when:
- User asks to "implement task/plan", "start implementation", "execute plan", or "start coding"
- Have task file (story-* or standalone-*) ready to execute
- User asks to "use TDD", "write test first", or "test-driven"
- User asks to "write tests", "add tests", "create tests"
- Fixing bugs (write failing test first)
TDD Iron Law: NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST TDD Cycle: RED (failing test) → Verify fails → GREEN (minimal code) → Verify passes → REFACTOR
Prerequisites:
- Task file in docs/reference/backend/tasks/ (story-* or standalone-*)
- Read constraints.md and design spec before coding
Flow: Read Task → Read Constraints → Execute Steps → Verify → Test → Update Status
Implement
Language Configuration
Before generating any content, check aico.json in project root for language field to determine the output language. If not set, default to English.
Process
-
Read task file (MANDATORY):
- Look for task file in
docs/reference/backend/tasks/ - Accept either:
- Story-based:
story-{story-name}.mdwith task number - Standalone:
standalone-{task-name}.mdwith task number
- Story-based:
- User must specify task number (e.g., "implement story-user-api Task 1" or "implement standalone-fix-auth Task 1")
- Both formats contain multiple tasks, just different naming
- If NOT exists or task number not specified → STOP and ask user which task to implement
- Look for task file in
-
Read constraints FIRST (before any code):
docs/reference/backend/design-system.md- Colors, typography, spacingdocs/reference/backend/constraints.md- Tech stack, patterns- If task references design:
docs/reference/backend/designs/{name}.md
-
Execute implementation steps:
- Read "Implementation Steps" section from task
- Execute each step in order
- Run verification command after each step
- If fail → fix before proceeding
- If pass → continue to next step
-
After all steps:
- Run unit tests
- Run build check
-
Update task status:
- Update the specific task section in the file
- Mark acceptance criteria checkboxes:
- [ ]→- [x] - Change Status from
pendingtocompleted - Update "Progress" section at bottom of file
- Both story-based and standalone files use the same format
-
Notify completion:
- Show task file path and task number
- Show completion status
- Check related Story (story-based only):
- Read
> **Story**:field from file header - If Story exists, check story file at
docs/reference/pm/stories/ - Update Story's Related Tasks section: mark this task as
- [x] - Count total vs completed tasks
- If all tasks completed, show: "✅ All tasks completed! Story {story-name} is ready for acceptance."
- If partial completion, show: "⏳ Progress: X/Y tasks completed"
- Read
Task File Format
See Task File Template for complete structure.
Both story-based and standalone tasks use the same file structure - the only difference is the filename:
- Story-based:
story-{story-name}.md(from PM story breakdown) - Standalone:
standalone-{task-name}.md(from plan/ad-hoc requirements)
Usage Examples:
implement story-user-api Task 1implement standalone-fix-auth Task 1
Execution Flow
Read Task File
↓
Read Constraints (design-system.md, constraints.md, designs/)
↓
Execute Step 1 → Verify → Pass? → Continue
↓
Fail → Fix → Retry
↓
Execute Step 2 → Verify → Pass? → Continue
↓
...
↓
Run Unit Tests
↓
Run Build Check
↓
Update Task File (mark AC completed, update status)
↓
Show Completion Summary
Step Execution Rules
Rule 1: Follow Constraints Exactly
// ❌ Wrong: Ignore design system
<button className="bg-blue-500 text-white">
// ✅ Right: Use design tokens
<button className="bg-primary text-primary-foreground">
Rule 2: Verify Before Proceeding
Each step has a Verify section - MUST run it and confirm expected output before moving on.
Rule 3: No Skipping
- Execute ALL steps in order
- Do NOT combine steps
- Do NOT skip verification
Post-Implementation Checklist
- Run tests:
npm test [component] - Run build:
npm run build - Update task file:
- Mark AC checkboxes:
- [x] - Update Status:
completed
- Mark AC checkboxes:
- Show completion summary to user
Error Handling
| Error Type | Action |
|---|---|
| TypeScript error | Fix type issues, re-verify |
| Test failure | Debug test, fix implementation or test |
| Build failure | Check imports, fix errors |
| Constraint violation | Re-read constraints, align code |
Updating Task File
After successful implementation, update the task file. Both story-based and standalone files use the same format, so the update process is identical:
1. Mark Task's Acceptance Criteria as Completed
## Task 1: Define Types
> **Status**: completed ← Changed from pending
### Acceptance Criteria
- [x] Types defined correctly ← Changed from [ ]
- [x] Exported from index ← Changed from [ ]
- [x] No type errors ← Changed from [ ]
2. Update Progress Section
## Progress
- Total tasks: 6
- Completed: 1 ← Changed from 0
- In progress: 0
- Pending: 5 ← Changed from 6
**Next task**: Task 2: Database Schema ← Update this
3. Update Story File Checkboxes (story-based only)
If this is a story-based task, update the PM story file at docs/reference/pm/stories/:
### Backend Tasks
- [x] Task 1: Define Types ← Changed from [ ]
- [ ] Task 2: Database Schema
- [ ] Task 3: Repository Layer
Key Rules
- ALWAYS read task file first
- ALWAYS read all constraint files before writing any code
- MUST run verification command for each step
- ALWAYS run tests before marking task complete
- MUST update task file (mark AC, update status)
Common Mistakes
- ❌ Start without reading task file → ✅ ALWAYS read task file first
- ❌ Skip reading constraints → ✅ ALWAYS read before coding
- ❌ Skip verification → ✅ Run verify command for each step
- ❌ Skip tests → ✅ Run tests before marking complete
- ❌ Forget to update task file → ✅ Update AC and status
TDD Deep Dive
The TDD Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
Red-Green-Refactor Cycle
RED → Verify Fails → GREEN → Verify Passes → REFACTOR → Repeat
1. RED - Write Failing Test
test('Button shows loading state when clicked', async () => {
render(<SubmitButton onClick={mockSubmit} />)
await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
expect(screen.getByTestId('spinner')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
2. Verify RED - Watch It Fail
npm test -- --watch ComponentName
3. GREEN - Write Minimal Code
Write simplest code to pass the test. Don't add features not in test.
4. Verify GREEN - Watch It Pass
5. REFACTOR - Clean Up
Only after green. Keep tests passing.
Testing Library Query Priority
getByRole- accessible by everyonegetByLabelText- form fieldsgetByText- non-interactive elementsgetByTestId- last resort
Test Coverage Requirements
| Component Type | Required Tests |
|---|---|
| UI Component | Render, props, variants |
| Form | Validation, submit, error states |
| Interactive | User events, callbacks |
| Data Display | Loading, error, empty states |
TDD Red Flags - STOP and Start Over
- Code before test
- Test passes immediately
- Testing implementation details
querySelectoreverywhere
Example Workflow
# User: "Implement story-user-profile-2-header"
1. ✓ Read task: docs/reference/backend/tasks/story-user-profile-2-header.md
2. ✓ Read constraints:
- design-system.md
- constraints.md
- designs/user-profile.md
3. ✓ Execute Step 1: Create component file
→ Run: npm run typecheck
→ ✓ Pass
4. ✓ Execute Step 2: Implement header layout
→ Run: npm run dev
→ ✓ Pass
5. ✓ Execute Step 3: Add responsive styles
→ Run: npm run dev (test at different breakpoints)
→ ✓ Pass
6. ✓ Execute Step 4: Add unit tests
→ Run: npm test LoginHeader
→ ✓ 3 tests passed
7. ✓ Run full test suite
→ Run: npm test
→ ✓ All tests passed
8. ✓ Run build
→ Run: npm run build
→ ✓ Build successful
9. ✓ Update task file:
- Marked all AC as completed
- Status: completed
10. ✓ Task completed!
Iron Law
NO CODE WITHOUT TASK FILE
This rule is non-negotiable. Before writing code:
- Task file must exist
- Acceptance criteria must be defined
- Implementation steps must be clear
Rationalization Defense
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "It's a simple change" | Simple changes often have hidden complexity |
| "I'll document after coding" | Post-hoc documentation is always incomplete |
| "Tests can wait until later" | Untested code is broken code |
| "I know what needs to be done" | Assumptions without validation cause bugs |