Use this skill when generating higher-level synthesis notes such as literature reviews, comparison matrices, project summaries, or other cross-note summaries inside the project knowledge base.
Skills(SKILL.md)は、AIエージェント(Claude Code、Cursor、Codexなど)に特定の能力を追加するための設定ファイルです。
詳しく見る →Use this skill when generating higher-level synthesis notes such as literature reviews, comparison matrices, project summaries, or other cross-note summaries inside the project knowledge base.
A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission.
Supports the complete workflow for the research project initiation phase, from literature review to research question definition, method selection, and research planning.
A systematic review response workflow that helps researchers efficiently and professionally reply to reviewer comments.
Execute improvement plans generated by `skill-quality-reviewer` to automatically update and fix issues in Claude Skills.
A meta-skill for evaluating the quality of Claude Skills. Perform comprehensive analysis across four key dimensions—description quality (25%), content organization (30%), writing style (20%), and stru
This skill should be used when the user asks to design or review a UI, create a landing page or dashboard, choose colors or typography, improve accessibility, or implement polished frontend interfaces with a clear design system.
Use this skill for targeted work on an existing Typst paper project. Route requests to the smallest useful module and keep outputs compatible with Typst source review.
Design or review an identification strategy for the sewage-house-prices project.
Conduct a structured literature search and synthesis for the sewage-house-prices project.
Run a comprehensive quality assessment of the sewage-house-prices project across all dimensions.
Simulate peer review of the "Sewage in Our Waters" manuscript by running two independent referee reviews and an editorial synthesis.
Run a code quality review on R scripts in the sewage project. Produces a report — does NOT edit source files.
Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. Codex designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective, CC reviews feasibility and implements.
Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.
> Override for Codex users who want **Gemini**, not a second Codex agent, to act as the reviewer. Install this package **after** `skills/skills-codex/*`.
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.
Communications-domain literature review and related-work search with database-aware source control. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, prior art, a survey, related work, or a landscape summary. Prioritize IEEE Xplore and ScienceDirect, prefer formal publications over preprints, and separate foundational work from recent progress.
Send a notification: **$ARGUMENTS**
Design clinical studies and report using CONSORT, STROBE guidelines
Multi-agent system for biomedical literature review and synthesis
Structured frameworks for market sizing, competitive analysis, and strategic ...
Search open access journals and articles in the DOAJ directory
Guide to preprint servers across scientific disciplines
Multi-source exhaustive literature search across academic databases
Search PLOS open access journals with full-text Solr-powered API
Access Latin American and developing world research via SciELO API
Construct rigorous systematic search strategies for literature reviews
Claude Code template for LaTeX, Beamer, and R research workflows
AI-driven multi-agent research assistant for end-to-end studies
13 deep research & systematic reviews skills. Trigger: systematic reviews, multi-source synthesis, comprehensive literature surveys. Design: multi-step research protocols with quality assessment and evidence grading.
Structured methodology for conducting exhaustive multi-source investigations
Claude Code-driven autonomous AI Scientist for discovery
Scoping review methodology for broad evidence mapping
Systematic review methodology with PRISMA and evidence synthesis
Prepare and justify research grant budgets across funding agencies
Navigate NSF grant applications, program selection, and strategies
Plan and manage systematic literature reviews with Parsifal platform
Simulate human research communities with multi-agent AI collaboration
Tools and pipelines for automating systematic literature reviews
8 peer review skills. Trigger: reviewing manuscripts, comparing papers, quality assessment. Design: systematic review criteria, evaluation rubrics, and automated review tools.
AI-assisted peer review tools, workflows, and quality standards
Automate systematic literature reviews with LatteReview AI agents
Structured framework for writing peer review reports and paper critiques
Conduct thorough, constructive peer reviews and evaluate research papers
Write effective rebuttals to reviewer comments for journal submissions
Craft effective point-by-point reviewer response letters
Write literature reviews and survey papers from collected papers
Deep dual-mode reading of academic papers from PDF or URL sources